These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25773377)
1. Proposal of a new method for the use of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork in the screening of diabetic polyneuropathy. A pilot study. de Simone R; Rabitti PG; De Feo EM; Manguso F; Piscopo G; Scionti L Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 May; 108(2):e21-4. PubMed ID: 25773377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest and time dependent variation and diagnostic values of vibratory sensation determined by biothesiometer and the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork. Wittenberg B; Svendsen TK; Gaist LM; Itani M; Gylfadottir SS; Jensen TS; Gaist D; Sindrup SH; Krøigård T Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2230. PubMed ID: 34087955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork as a predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy compared with a neurothesiometer. Kästenbauer T; Sauseng S; Brath H; Abrahamian H; Irsigler K Diabet Med; 2004 Jun; 21(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 15154940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential. Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group. Martina IS; van Koningsveld R; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 65(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 9810949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of qualitative versus quantitative tuning forks: outcome measure for neuropathy. Lai S; Ahmed U; Bollineni A; Lewis R; Ramchandren S J Clin Neuromuscul Dis; 2014 Mar; 15(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 24534830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a novel screening device (NeuroQuick) for quantitative assessment of small nerve fiber dysfunction as an early feature of diabetic polyneuropathy. Ziegler D; Siekierka-Kleiser E; Meyer B; Schweers M Diabetes Care; 2005 May; 28(5):1169-74. PubMed ID: 15855584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Foot screening technique in a diabetic population. Shin JB; Seong YJ; Lee HJ; Kim SH; Park JR J Korean Med Sci; 2000 Feb; 15(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 10719814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the Rydel-Seiffer graduated tuning fork in the assessment of vibration threshold in postherpetic neuralgia patients and healthy controls. Whitton TL; Johnson RW; Lovell AT Eur J Pain; 2005 Apr; 9(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 15737809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication. Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold. Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can the 128-Hz tuning fork be an alternative to the biothesiometer for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening? A cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in East India. Chattopadhyay S; Goswami S; Sengupta N; Baidya A BMJ Open; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e082193. PubMed ID: 38862223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hidden dangers revealed by misdiagnosed diabetic neuropathy: A comparison of simple clinical tests for the screening of vibration perception threshold at primary care level. Azzopardi K; Gatt A; Chockalingam N; Formosa C Prim Care Diabetes; 2018 Apr; 12(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29029862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude. Pestronk A; Florence J; Levine T; Al-Lozi MT; Lopate G; Miller T; Ramneantu I; Waheed W; Stambuk M Neurology; 2004 Feb; 62(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 14872031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Difficulties in screening for peripheral neuropathies in children with diabetes. Hirschfeld G; von Glischinski M; Knop C; Wiesel T; Reinehr T; Aksu F; Blankenburg M; Hirsch J; Zernikow B Diabet Med; 2015 Jun; 32(6):786-9. PubMed ID: 25640325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Perception of vibration. Normal findings and methodologic aspects]. Claus D; Carvalho VP; Neundörfer B; Blaise JF Nervenarzt; 1988 Mar; 59(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3374714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The Rydel-Seiffer diapason for use in inspecting a diabetic foot]. Betancor Delgado A; Lasso Quintero J Rev Enferm; 2010 Mar; 33(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 20429207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choosing a Vibratory Test to Pair With Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing for Evaluating Lower Extremity Sensation in Patients With Diabetes: A Comparison of Three Vibratory Methodologies. Raymond B; Steriovski J; Gillyard K; Yang C; Wu SC; Crews RT J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31113243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and responsiveness of a graduated tuning fork in immune mediated polyneuropathies. The Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Group. Merkies IS; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 May; 68(5):669-71. PubMed ID: 10766905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]