These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25773558)

  • 1. Public preferences for prioritizing preventive and curative health care interventions: a discrete choice experiment.
    Luyten J; Kessels R; Goos P; Beutels P
    Value Health; 2015 Mar; 18(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 25773558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
    Shiroiwa T; Saito S; Shimozuma K; Kodama S; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 26940671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The Trade-Off between Chance of Success and Urgency in Organ Allocation: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Public Preferences].
    Dao Van M; Lauerer M; Schätzlein V; Nagel E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Jul; 78(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 27438162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
    Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Valuing QALYs in Relation to Equity Considerations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    van de Wetering L; van Exel J; Bobinac A; Brouwer WB
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1289-300. PubMed ID: 26232199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values.
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Mar; 82(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 15112005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public preferences for prevention versus cure: what if an ounce of prevention is worth only an ounce of cure?
    Ubel PA; Spranca MD; Dekay ML; Hershey JC; Asch DA
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 9566447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
    Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models.
    Seghieri C; Mengoni A; Nuti S
    Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Sep; 15(7):773-85. PubMed ID: 24241816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.
    Koopmanschap MA; Stolk EA; Koolman X
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Apr; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20392324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: does the type of health gain matter?
    Mason H; Baker R; Donaldson C
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Apr; 16(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 21447843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment.
    Krinke KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
    BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 31185940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
    Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient preferences for treatment of low back pain-a discrete choice experiment.
    Kløjgaard ME; Manniche C; Pedersen LB; Bech M; Søgaard R
    Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 24968999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewing emergency care systems 2: measuring patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment.
    Gerard K; Lattimer V; Turnbull J; Smith H; George S; Brailsford S; Maslin-Prothero S
    Emerg Med J; 2004 Nov; 21(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 15496695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of health promotion: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Alayli-Goebbels AF; Dellaert BG; Knox SA; Ament AJ; Lakerveld J; Bot SD; Nijpels G; Severens JL
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 23337222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criteria for medical prioritisation: results from a regional survey and methodological reflections].
    Stumpf S; Hecker S; Raspe H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Apr; 76(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 23913398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value judgment of new medical treatments: Societal and patient perspectives to inform priority setting in The Netherlands.
    Nicolet A; van Asselt ADI; Vermeulen KM; Krabbe PFM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235666. PubMed ID: 32645035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equity in health care prioritisation: an empirical inquiry into social value.
    Stolk EA; Pickee SJ; Ament AH; Busschbach JJ
    Health Policy; 2005 Nov; 74(3):343-55. PubMed ID: 16226144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.