BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25774607)

  • 21. Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: a CALIBER study.
    Shah AD; Bartlett JW; Carpenter J; Nicholas O; Hemingway H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(6):764-74. PubMed ID: 24589914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation in Cox model with missing failure subtype.
    Guo F; Langworthy B; Ogino S; Wang M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Feb; 33(2):344-356. PubMed ID: 38262434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multiple imputation of missing covariates for the Cox proportional hazards cure model.
    Beesley LJ; Bartlett JW; Wolf GT; Taylor JM
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4701-4717. PubMed ID: 27439726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imputing missing covariates in time-to-event analysis within distributed research networks: A simulation study.
    Li D; Wong J; Li X; Toh S; Wang R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Mar; 32(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 36380400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
    Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dealing with missing information on covariates for excess mortality hazard regression models - Making the imputation model compatible with the substantive model.
    Antunes L; Mendonça D; Bento MJ; Njagi EN; Belot A; Rachet B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2256-2268. PubMed ID: 34473604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
    Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
    Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 22695083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.
    Sperrin M; Martin GP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):185. PubMed ID: 32640992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How are missing data in covariates handled in observational time-to-event studies in oncology? A systematic review.
    Carroll OU; Morris TP; Keogh RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):134. PubMed ID: 32471366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: Scoping review and new results.
    Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):840-860. PubMed ID: 32510791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values.
    White IR; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2920-31. PubMed ID: 20842622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of two formal tests based on martingales residuals to check the proportional hazard assumption and the functional form of the prognostic factors in flexible parametric excess hazard models.
    Danieli C; Bossard N; Roche L; Belot A; Uhry Z; Charvat H; Remontet L
    Biostatistics; 2017 Jul; 18(3):505-520. PubMed ID: 28334368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dealing with missing delirium assessments in prospective clinical studies of the critically ill: a simulation study and reanalysis of two delirium studies.
    Raman R; Chen W; Harhay MO; Thompson JL; Ely EW; Pandharipande PP; Patel MB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):97. PubMed ID: 33952189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Optimal Machine Learning-Based Missing Data Imputation for the Cox Proportional Hazard Model.
    Guo CY; Yang YC; Chen YH
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():680054. PubMed ID: 34291028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation.
    Vader DT; Mamtani R; Li Y; Griffith SD; Calip GS; Hubbard RA
    Epidemiology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):520-530. PubMed ID: 37155612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Incomplete Longitudinal Data in Life-Course Epidemiology.
    Shaw C; Wu Y; Zimmerman SC; Hayes-Larson E; Belin TR; Power MC; Glymour MM; Mayeda ER
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 192(12):2075-2084. PubMed ID: 37338987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival analysis under imperfect record linkage using historic census data.
    Marks-Anglin AK; Barg FK; Ross M; Wiebe DJ; Hwang WT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):67. PubMed ID: 38481152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.