These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25774995)

  • 21. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How do observer's responses affect visual long-term memory?
    Makovski T; Jiang YV; Swallow KM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1097-105. PubMed ID: 23206170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context - an electrophysiological study.
    Ecker UK; Zimmer HD; Groh-Bordin C; Mecklinger A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 May; 64(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17331603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Congruency effects in conceptualizing for speech.
    Kuipers JR; La Heij W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2155-68. PubMed ID: 22630114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. School-aged children can benefit from audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding.
    Heikkilä J; Tiippana K
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1199-207. PubMed ID: 26048162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When reasoning modifies memory: schematic assimilation triggered by analogical mapping.
    Vendetti MS; Wu A; Rowshanshad E; Knowlton BJ; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1172-80. PubMed ID: 24707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Misremembering what you see or hear: Dissociable effects of modality on short- and long-term false recognition.
    Olszewska JM; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Munier E; Bendler SA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1316-25. PubMed ID: 25867611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of aging and divided attention on memory for items and their contexts.
    Craik FI; Luo L; Sakuta Y
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):968-79. PubMed ID: 20973605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The attentional boost effect with verbal materials.
    Mulligan NW; Spataro P; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 24611436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.
    Bancroft TD; Hockley WE; Farquhar R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 22845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention.
    Clark-Foos A; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2008; 16(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 18569681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus-classification and stimulus-action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability.
    Moutsopoulou K; Yang Q; Desantis A; Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1744-57. PubMed ID: 25396708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incidental encoding strategies did not improve contextual memory in Parkinson's disease patients.
    dos Santos CM; Balardin JB; Irigaray TQ; Schröder N; Rieder CR; Bromberg E
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2010 Jun; 24(5):450-6. PubMed ID: 20026872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
    Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of local and global processing in the recognition of living and nonliving things.
    Thomas R; Forde E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):982-6. PubMed ID: 16253294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition.
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Barber H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1803-17. PubMed ID: 16269115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects.
    Liefooghe B; Wenke D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1325-35. PubMed ID: 22545614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.