BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25775489)

  • 1. Utilizing image scales towards totally training free blind image quality assessment.
    Saha A; Wu QM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1879-92. PubMed ID: 25775489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment.
    Gao F; Tao D; Gao X; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2275-90. PubMed ID: 25616080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence.
    Hassen R; Wang Z; Salama MM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jul; 22(7):2798-810. PubMed ID: 23481852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Perceptual image dissimilarity--a novel metric for objective assessment of image quality in computed tomography with iterative reconstruction].
    Yamada S; Ueguchi T; Ogata T; Ogihara R; Murase K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2014; 34(2):35-46. PubMed ID: 25693290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.
    Jingtao Xu ; Peng Ye ; Qiaohong Li ; Haiqing Du ; Yong Liu ; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Sep; 25(9):4444-4457. PubMed ID: 27362977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs.
    Kede Ma ; Wentao Liu ; Tongliang Liu ; Zhou Wang ; Dacheng Tao
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Aug; 26(8):3951-3964. PubMed ID: 28574353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single image super-resolution with multiscale similarity learning.
    Zhang K; Gao X; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1648-59. PubMed ID: 24808601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images.
    Oh J; Woolley SI; Arvanitis TN; Townend JN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1352-61. PubMed ID: 11811835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blind CT Image Quality Assessment Using DDPM-derived Content and Transformer-based Evaluator.
    Shi Y; Xia W; Wang G; Mou X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 Jun; PP():. PubMed ID: 38913529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality assessment based on multiscale geometric analysis.
    Gao X; Lu W; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1409-23. PubMed ID: 19447715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fourier transform based scalable image quality measure.
    Narwaria M; Lin W; McLoughlin I; Emmanuel S; Chia LT
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Aug; 21(8):3364-77. PubMed ID: 22562758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Completely blind image quality assessment via image gray-scale fluctuations and fractal dimension analysis.
    Yang X; Sun Q; Wang T
    Appl Opt; 2018 Apr; 57(12):3268-3280. PubMed ID: 29714314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
    Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.