188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25777138)
1. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cueing others' memories.
Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):634-46. PubMed ID: 25377508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?
Tullis JG; Finley JR
Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1308-1319. PubMed ID: 34546833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.
Tullis JG; Fraundorf SH
Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):765-781. PubMed ID: 34731430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generating mnemonics boosts recall of chemistry information.
Tullis JG; Qiu J
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 33939460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
Jang Y; Lee H
Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of retrieval practice on metacognition: The contribution of analytic and non-analytic processes.
Miller TM; Geraci L
Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():41-50. PubMed ID: 26985881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential contribution of left and right prefrontal cortex to associative cued-recall memory: a parametric PET study.
Lepage M
Neurosci Res; 2004 Mar; 48(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15154675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.
Tullis JG; Braverman M; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 23835617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.
Jaeger A; Queiroz MC; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1477-1493. PubMed ID: 32105146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: the effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task.
Taconnat L; Froger C; Sacher M; Isingrini M
Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
