These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25777138)

  • 1. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cueing others' memories.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):634-46. PubMed ID: 25377508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?
    Tullis JG; Finley JR
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1308-1319. PubMed ID: 34546833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.
    Tullis JG; Fraundorf SH
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):765-781. PubMed ID: 34731430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
    Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generating mnemonics boosts recall of chemistry information.
    Tullis JG; Qiu J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 33939460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
    Jang Y; Lee H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of retrieval practice on metacognition: The contribution of analytic and non-analytic processes.
    Miller TM; Geraci L
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():41-50. PubMed ID: 26985881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metacognitive processes accompanying the first stages of autobiographical retrieval in the self-memory system.
    Carreras F; Moulin CJA; Tales A; Barnes CM; Souchay C
    Memory; 2024 Jul; 32(6):776-789. PubMed ID: 38963905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential contribution of left and right prefrontal cortex to associative cued-recall memory: a parametric PET study.
    Lepage M
    Neurosci Res; 2004 Mar; 48(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15154675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.
    Tullis JG; Braverman M; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 23835617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.
    Jaeger A; Queiroz MC; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1477-1493. PubMed ID: 32105146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.