These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25777138)

  • 21. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.
    Storm BC; Hickman ML; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 26822535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Serial attention to serial memory: The psychological refractory period in forward and backward cued recall.
    Logan GD; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Sep; 145():101583. PubMed ID: 37429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
    Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do learners predict a shift from recency to primacy with delay?
    Storm BC; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1204-1214. PubMed ID: 27380499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
    Park H; Rugg MD
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Congruency effects in part-list cuing inhibition.
    Sloman SA; Bower GH; Rohrer D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Sep; 17(5):974-82. PubMed ID: 1834778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
    Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Making remembering more memorable.
    Leppanen ML; Lyle KB
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural correlates of encoding processes predicting subsequent cued recall and source memory.
    Angel L; Isingrini M; Bouazzaoui B; Fay S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Mar; 24(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 23381350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading.
    Hu X; Luo L; Fleming SM
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104012. PubMed ID: 31271925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intelligence as the efficiency of cue-driven retrieval from secondary memory.
    Liesefeld HR; Hoffmann E; Wentura D
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 25626154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of item similarity in part-list cueing impairment.
    Aslan A; Bauml KH
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):697-707. PubMed ID: 19575327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interference from retrieval cues in Parkinson's disease.
    Crescentini C; Marin D; Del Missier F; Biasutti E; Shallice T
    Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):720-33. PubMed ID: 21728428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retrieval constraints on associative elaborations.
    Marks W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Apr; 13(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 2952759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.