These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25777741)

  • 1. META: an MRI-based scoring system differentiating metastatic from osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
    Kato S; Hozumi T; Yamakawa K; Saito M; Goto T; Kondo T
    Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1563-70. PubMed ID: 25777741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel MRI- and CT-based scoring system to differentiate malignant from osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Chinese patients.
    Li Z; Guan M; Sun D; Xu Y; Li F; Xiong W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Nov; 19(1):406. PubMed ID: 30458738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The META score for differentiating metastatic from osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an independent agreement assessment.
    Besa P; Urrutia J; Campos M; Mobarec S; Cruz JP; Cikutovic P; Diaz G
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2074-2080. PubMed ID: 29709548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential diagnosis between metastatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures using sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yamamoto Y; Iwata E; Shigematsu H; Morita T; Tanaka M; Okuda A; Masuda K; Ikejiri M; Nakajima H; Koizumi M; Tanaka Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Sep; 25(5):763-769. PubMed ID: 31771804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of inter- and intraobserver agreement for META score in distinguishing osteoporotic from multiple myeloma vertebral fractures.
    Abdala EHC; Oliveira JPAE; de Sousa Pontes MD; Ganeo ÂAB; Nogueira-Barbosa MH; Herrero CFPS
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Aug; 33(8):3268-3274. PubMed ID: 38717495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic and classification process of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
    Marongiu G; Congia S; Verona M; Lombardo M; Podda D; Capone A
    Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S26-S31. PubMed ID: 30415666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Differentiation Between Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture and Malignant Vertebral Fracture on MRI Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.
    Yoda T; Maki S; Furuya T; Yokota H; Matsumoto K; Takaoka H; Miyamoto T; Okimatsu S; Shiga Y; Inage K; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Yamashita T; Masuda Y; Uno T; Ohtori S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Apr; 47(8):E347-E352. PubMed ID: 34919075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benign versus malignant compression fracture: a diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Pongpornsup S; Wajanawichakorn P; Danchaivijitr N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jan; 92(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19260246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography-based scoring system for the differential diagnosis of vertebral fractures caused by osteoporosis and malignant tumors.
    Yuzawa Y; Ebara S; Kamimura M; Tateiwa Y; Kinoshita T; Itoh H; Takahashi J; Karakida O; Sheena Y; Takaoka K
    J Orthop Sci; 2005 Jul; 10(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16075165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the painful level in osteoporotic vertebral fractures--Retrospective comparison between plain film, bone scan, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lin HH; Chou PH; Wang ST; Yu JK; Chang MC; Liu CL
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Dec; 78(12):714-8. PubMed ID: 26364958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating vertebral compression fractures caused by malignancy, osteoporosis, and infections.
    Abdel-Wanis ME; Solyman MT; Hasan NM
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2011 Aug; 19(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 21857034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Takahashi S; Hoshino M; Takayama K; Iseki K; Sasaoka R; Tsujio T; Yasuda H; Sasaki T; Kanematsu F; Kono H; Toyoda H; Nakamura H
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):473-482. PubMed ID: 27577726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging?
    An HS; Andreshak TG; Nguyen C; Williams A; Daniels D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Aug; 20(16):1776-82. PubMed ID: 7502133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation between osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures.
    Pozzi G; Garcia Parra C; Stradiotti P; Tien TV; Luzzati A; Zerbi A
    Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S123-7. PubMed ID: 22411038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristic radiographic or magnetic resonance images of fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures predicting potential risk for nonunion: a prospective multicenter study.
    Tsujio T; Nakamura H; Terai H; Hoshino M; Namikawa T; Matsumura A; Kato M; Suzuki A; Takayama K; Fukushima W; Kondo K; Hirota Y; Takaoka K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1229-35. PubMed ID: 21217433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of evidence on malignant spinal metastases: natural history and technologies for identifying patients at high risk of vertebral fracture and spinal cord compression.
    Sutcliffe P; Connock M; Shyangdan D; Court R; Kandala NB; Clarke A
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Sep; 17(42):1-274. PubMed ID: 24070110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical importance of posterior vertebral height loss on plain radiography when conservatively treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
    Seo JY; Kwon YS; Kim KJ; Shin JY; Kim YH; Ha KY
    Injury; 2017 Jul; 48(7):1503-1509. PubMed ID: 28477991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?
    Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Duerr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 25148160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Differentiation between acute osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures by imaging].
    Geith T; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
    Unfallchirurg; 2015 Mar; 118(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 25783690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Geith T; Biffar A; Schmidt G; Sourbron S; Dürr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W635-43. PubMed ID: 23701095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.