216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25778320)
1. Is radiofrequency ablation equal to surgical re-resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria? A meta-analysis.
Zhang CS; Zhang JL; Li XH; Li L; Li X; Zhou XY
J BUON; 2015; 20(1):223-30. PubMed ID: 25778320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Li L; Zhang J; Liu X; Li X; Jiao B; Kang T
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22004366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiofrequency ablation vs. surgical resection on the treatment of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: a system review and meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials.
Fu C; Liu N; Deng Q; Li X; Ma K; Bie P
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 61(134):1722-9. PubMed ID: 25436369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas within the Milan criteria.
Ueno S; Sakoda M; Kubo F; Hiwatashi K; Tateno T; Baba Y; Hasegawa S; Tsubouchi H;
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2009; 16(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 19300896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: salvage transplantation, repeated resection, or radiofrequency ablation?
Chan AC; Chan SC; Chok KS; Cheung TT; Chiu DW; Poon RT; Fan ST; Lo CM
Liver Transpl; 2013 Apr; 19(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 23447460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcome of small hepatocellular carcinoma after different treatments: a meta-analysis.
Dong W; Zhang T; Wang ZG; Liu H
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(29):10174-82. PubMed ID: 25110446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival following redo hepatectomy vs radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gavriilidis P; Askari A; Azoulay D
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Jan; 19(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 28341429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appropriate treatment strategies for intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma initially within the Milan criteria: according to the recurrence pattern.
Zhang X; Li C; Wen T; Yan L; Li B; Yang J; Wang W; Xu M; Lu W; Jiang L
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Aug; 27(8):933-40. PubMed ID: 25933127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiofrequency ablation is better than surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria and preserved liver function: a retrospective study using propensity score analyses.
Lee YH; Hsu CY; Chu CW; Liu PH; Hsia CY; Huang YH; Su CW; Chiou YY; Lin HC; Huo TI
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 49(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 24714185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria--a comparative study.
Lai EC; Tang CN
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 23220487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection as primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria: a systematic review.
Cho YK; Rhim H; Noh S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Sep; 26(9):1354-60. PubMed ID: 21679247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a meta-analysis.
Chen X; Chen Y; Li Q; Ma D; Shen B; Peng C
J Surg Res; 2015 May; 195(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 25724768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of long-term effectiveness and complications of radiofrequency ablation with hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma.
Fang Y; Chen W; Liang X; Li D; Lou H; Chen R; Wang K; Pan H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 29(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 24224779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC conforming to the Milan criteria.
Huang J; Yan L; Cheng Z; Wu H; Du L; Wang J; Xu Y; Zeng Y
Ann Surg; 2010 Dec; 252(6):903-12. PubMed ID: 21107100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials.
Jia Z; Zhang H; Li N
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1769-1777. PubMed ID: 33569810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials.
Wang Y; Luo Q; Li Y; Deng S; Wei S; Li X
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84484. PubMed ID: 24404166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effect of hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Liu Z; Zhou Y; Zhang P; Qin H
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2010 Jun; 20(3):130-40. PubMed ID: 20551807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) vs. Surgical Resection (SR) on Survival Outcome of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Guo W; He X; Li Z; Li Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2015 May; 62(139):710-4. PubMed ID: 26897959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis].
Zhou DC; Geng XP; Zhu LX; Zhao HC; Liu FB; Zhao YJ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1132-6. PubMed ID: 22333458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly: Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.
Hung AK; Guy J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Nov; 21(42):12197-210. PubMed ID: 26576104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
