227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25778831)
1. Navigating through metaproteomics data: a logbook of database searching.
Muth T; Kolmeder CA; Salojärvi J; Keskitalo S; Varjosalo M; Verdam FJ; Rensen SS; Reichl U; de Vos WM; Rapp E; Martens L
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3439-53. PubMed ID: 25778831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating de novo sequencing in proteomics: already an accurate alternative to database-driven peptide identification?
Muth T; Renard BY
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):954-970. PubMed ID: 28369237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metaproteomic analysis using the Galaxy framework.
Jagtap PD; Blakely A; Murray K; Stewart S; Kooren J; Johnson JE; Rhodus NL; Rudney J; Griffin TJ
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3553-65. PubMed ID: 26058579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process.
Feng XD; Li LW; Zhang JH; Zhu YP; Chang C; Shu KX; Ma J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):143. PubMed ID: 28361671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MetaNovo: An open-source pipeline for probabilistic peptide discovery in complex metaproteomic datasets.
Potgieter MG; Nel AJM; Fortuin S; Garnett S; Wendoh JM; Tabb DL; Mulder NJ; Blackburn JM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Jun; 19(6):e1011163. PubMed ID: 37327214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the quality of genome, protein sequence, and taxonomy databases: a prerequisite for microbiome meta-omics 2.0.
Pible O; Armengaud J
Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3418-23. PubMed ID: 26038180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metaproteomic data analysis at a glance: advances in computational microbial community proteomics.
Muth T; Renard BY; Martens L
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2016 Aug; 13(8):757-69. PubMed ID: 27376173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PepExplorer: a similarity-driven tool for analyzing de novo sequencing results.
Leprevost FV; Valente RH; Lima DB; Perales J; Melani R; Yates JR; Barbosa VC; Junqueira M; Carvalho PC
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 Sep; 13(9):2480-9. PubMed ID: 24878498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tandem Mass Spectrum Sequencing: An Alternative to Database Search Engines in Shotgun Proteomics.
Muth T; Rapp E; Berven FS; Barsnes H; Vaudel M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():217-226. PubMed ID: 27975219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive and scalable database search system for metaproteomics.
Chatterjee S; Stupp GS; Park SK; Ducom JC; Yates JR; Su AI; Wolan DW
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):642. PubMed ID: 27528457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MetaPro-IQ: a universal metaproteomic approach to studying human and mouse gut microbiota.
Zhang X; Ning Z; Mayne J; Moore JI; Li J; Butcher J; Deeke SA; Chen R; Chiang CK; Wen M; Mack D; Stintzi A; Figeys D
Microbiome; 2016 Jun; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 27343061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proteomics-grade de novo sequencing approach.
Savitski MM; Nielsen ML; Kjeldsen F; Zubarev RA
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2348-54. PubMed ID: 16335984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Search and decoy: the automatic identification of mass spectra.
Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Turewicz M; Koch MH; Uszkoreit J; Stephan C
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():445-88. PubMed ID: 22665317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of de Novo Sequencing to Large-Scale Complex Proteomics Data Sets.
Devabhaktuni A; Elias JE
J Proteome Res; 2016 Mar; 15(3):732-42. PubMed ID: 26743026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative database search engine analysis on massive tandem mass spectra of pork-based food products for halal proteomics.
Amir SH; Yuswan MH; Aizat WM; Mansor MK; Desa MNM; Yusof YA; Song LK; Mustafa S
J Proteomics; 2021 Jun; 241():104240. PubMed ID: 33894373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A complex standard for protein identification, designed by evolution.
Vaudel M; Burkhart JM; Breiter D; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2012 Oct; 11(10):5065-71. PubMed ID: 22489649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Database Search Engines: Paradigms, Challenges and Solutions.
Verheggen K; Martens L; Berven FS; Barsnes H; Vaudel M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():147-156. PubMed ID: 27975215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates.
Shteynberg D; Deutsch EW; Lam H; Eng JK; Sun Z; Tasman N; Mendoza L; Moritz RL; Aebersold R; Nesvizhskii AI
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Dec; 10(12):M111.007690. PubMed ID: 21876204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing metaproteomics database construction: lessons from a study of the vaginal microbiome.
Lee EM; Srinivasan S; Purvine SO; Fiedler TL; Leiser OP; Proll SC; Minot SS; Deatherage Kaiser BL; Fredricks DN
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0067822. PubMed ID: 37350639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jan; 9(1):605-10. PubMed ID: 19916561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
