199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25778910)
1. Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity?
Sedgwick P
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1435. PubMed ID: 25778910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century.
Feinstein AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 7853050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.
Xu H; Platt RW; Luo ZC; Wei S; Fraser WD
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():18-28. PubMed ID: 18237348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mega-trials vs. meta-analysis: precision vs. heterogeneity?
Shrier I; Platt RW; Steele RJ
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17188025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.
Navarese EP; Koziński M; Pafundi T; Andreotti F; Buffon A; Servi SD; Kubica J
Cardiol J; 2011; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21305479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies].
Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
Zhou Y; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2701-17. PubMed ID: 24903142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of excess statistical significance in meta-analyses of 98 biomarker associations with cancer risk.
Tsilidis KK; Papatheodorou SI; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(24):1867-78. PubMed ID: 23090067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data discrepancies in meta-analyses that use standarized mean differences.
McGuire H; Edmonds M; Price J
JAMA; 2007 Nov; 298(19):2261-2; author reply 2262-3. PubMed ID: 18029827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Antibiotic treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: multiple meta-analyses and dilemmas in interpretation.
Varma R; Gupta JK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16129546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence.
Cheung SF; Chan DK
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Hanratty CG; Ward M
Circulation; 2001 Oct; 104(15):E83-4. PubMed ID: 11591634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
