172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25780013)
1. Dermatopathologists' opinions about the quality of clinical information in the skin biopsy requisition form and the skin biopsy care process: a semiqualitative assessment.
Wong C; Peters M; Tilburt J; Comfere N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):593-7. PubMed ID: 25780013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dermatopathologists' concerns and challenges with clinical information in the skin biopsy requisition form: a mixed-methods study.
Comfere NI; Peters MS; Jenkins S; Lackore K; Yost K; Tilburt J
J Cutan Pathol; 2015 May; 42(5):333-45. PubMed ID: 25757028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How informative are dermatopathology requisition forms completed by dermatologists? A review of the clinical information provided for 100 consecutive melanocytic lesions.
Waller JM; Zedek DC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 62(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 19962786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measures of Completeness and Accuracy of Clinical Information in Skin Biopsy Requisition Forms: An Analysis of 249 Cases.
Romano RC; Novotny PJ; Sloan JA; Comfere NI
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 146(6):727-735. PubMed ID: 28028116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who sends what: a comparison of dermatopathology referrals from dermatologists, pathologists and dermatopathologists.
Goldenberg G; Camacho F; Gildea J; Golitz LE
J Cutan Pathol; 2008 Jul; 35(7):658-61. PubMed ID: 18201232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Provider-to-provider communication in dermatology and implications of missing clinical information in skin biopsy requisition forms: a systematic review.
Comfere NI; Sokumbi O; Montori VM; LeBlanc A; Prokop LJ; Murad MH; Tilburt JC
Int J Dermatol; 2014 May; 53(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 24116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practical Strategies to Improve the Clinical Utility of the Dermatopathology Report.
Trotter MJ; Au S; Naert KA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 140(8):759-65. PubMed ID: 27472234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How concerns and experiences with medical malpractice affect dermatopathologists' perceptions of their diagnostic practices when interpreting cutaneous melanocytic lesions.
Carney PA; Frederick PD; Reisch LM; Knezevich S; Piepkorn MW; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Geller BM; Titus L; Weinstock MA; Nelson HD; Elmore JG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 74(2):317-24; quiz 324.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26559597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dermatopathologists' Experience With and Perceptions of Patient Online Access to Pathologic Test Result Reports.
Shucard H; Piepkorn MW; Reisch LM; Kerr KF; Radick AC; Wang PC; Knezevich SR; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Elmore JG
JAMA Dermatol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):320-324. PubMed ID: 31995131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing comfort level with pediatric skin specimens among dermatopathologists and pediatric pathologists: A national cross-sectional survey.
Enos T; Hughes C; Kelley S; Mir A; Rakheja D; Vandergriff T
J Cutan Pathol; 2021 Sep; 48(9):1109-1114. PubMed ID: 33635594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rates of provision of clinical information in the skin biopsy requisition form and corresponding encounter visit note.
Olson MA; Lohse CM; Comfere NI
J Pathol Inform; 2016; 7():40. PubMed ID: 27688931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation of cutaneous biopsy specimens: choice of pathologist by primary care practitioners.
Kirsner RS; Federman DG
South Med J; 2001 May; 94(5):461-3. PubMed ID: 11372790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin biopsy indications in primary care practice: a population-based study.
Jones TP; Boiko PE; Piepkorn MW
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1996; 9(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 8923396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinicopathological consistency in skin disorders: a retrospective study of 3949 pathological reports.
Aslan C; Göktay F; Mansur AT; Aydıngöz IE; Güneş P; Ekmekçi TR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Mar; 66(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22142653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the term "rule out" in requisition forms may cause diagnostic delays in dermatopathology practice.
Abdou Y; Lohse C; Comfere NI
Int J Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 27778322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The dermatopathology requisition form: attitudes and practices of dermatologists.
Chismar LA; Umanoff N; Murphy B; Viola KV; Amin B
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 Feb; 72(2):353-5. PubMed ID: 25592344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assessment of skin biopsy specimens referred to anonymous consultants.
Penneys NS
Arch Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 132(9):1053-6. PubMed ID: 8795545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.
Gaudi S; Zarandona JM; Raab SS; English JC; Jukic DM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 22892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dermatopathology in German-speaking Europe. Developments and perspectives].
Kerl H; Stadler R
Hautarzt; 2007 Sep; 58(9):730-4. PubMed ID: 17701142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of dermatopathology specimens is within the standard of care of dermatology practice.
Hancox JG; Neville JA; Chen J; Coldiron B; Williford PM; Feldman SR
Dermatol Surg; 2005 Mar; 31(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 15841632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
