302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25780297)
1. Cross-modality PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging for pancreatic cancer.
Zhang J; Zuo CJ; Jia NY; Wang JH; Hu SP; Yu ZF; Zheng Y; Zhang AY; Feng XY
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 21(10):2988-96. PubMed ID: 25780297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Kim EY; Lee WJ; Choi D; Lee SJ; Choi JY; Kim BT; Kim HS
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 20226612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging accuracy of pancreatic cancer: comparison between non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced PET/CT.
Yoneyama T; Tateishi U; Endo I; Inoue T
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1734-9. PubMed ID: 25043494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of (11)C-choline PET/CT and enhanced CT in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary abnormalities and locoregional lymph node involvement in lung cancer.
Peng Z; Liu Q; Li M; Han M; Yao S; Liu Q
Clin Lung Cancer; 2012 Jul; 13(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 22182444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-PET/CT compared to stand-alone contrast enhanced CT for the detection of extra-hepatic metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET).
Albanus DR; Apitzsch J; Erdem Z; Erdem O; Verburg FA; Behrendt FF; Mottaghy FM; Heinzel A
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1866-72. PubMed ID: 26152870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Santhosh S; Mittal BR; Bhasin DK; Rana SS; Gupta R; Das A; Nada R
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Oct; 31(8):575-581. PubMed ID: 28689356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study.
Buchs NC; Bühler L; Bucher P; Willi JP; Frossard JL; Roth AD; Addeo P; Rosset A; Terraz S; Becker CD; Ratib O; Morel P
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Apr; 26(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 21155879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Kunawudhi A; Sereeborwornthanasak K; Promteangtrong C; Siripongpreeda B; Vanprom S; Chotipanich C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(8):4071-5. PubMed ID: 27644663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer: impact on diagnosis, staging, evaluation of treatment response, and detection of recurrence.
Asagi A; Ohta K; Nasu J; Tanada M; Nadano S; Nishimura R; Teramoto N; Yamamoto K; Inoue T; Iguchi H
Pancreas; 2013 Jan; 42(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 22699206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography on the pre-operative staging and the management of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
Wang XY; Yang F; Jin C; Guan YH; Zhang HW; Fu DL
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 Oct; 61(135):2102-9. PubMed ID: 25722999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluating metastatic disease in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Kim MJ; Lee KH; Lee KT; Lee JK; Ku BH; Oh CR; Heo JS; Choi SH; Choi DW
Pancreas; 2012 Aug; 41(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 22699202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis in the restaging of patient with ovarian cancer as compared to contrast enhanced CT and tumor marker Ca-125.
Rubini G; Altini C; Notaristefano A; Merenda N; Rubini D; Ianora AA; Asabella AN
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23948509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Takahashi S; Ebina Y; Miyahara Y; Yamada H; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1672-6. PubMed ID: 23727380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in follow-up of curatively resected pancreatic cancer patients.
Jung W; Jang JY; Kang MJ; Chang YR; Shin YC; Chang J; Kim SW
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Jan; 18(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 26776852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical impact of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: diagnosing lymph node metastasis and predicting survival.
Kim HR; Seo M; Nah YW; Park HW; Park SH
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):691-698. PubMed ID: 29893751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative nodal staging of uterine cancer: is contrast-enhanced PET/CT more accurate than non-enhanced PET/CT or enhanced CT alone?
Kitajima K; Suzuki K; Senda M; Kita M; Nakamoto Y; Sakamoto S; Onishi Y; Maeda T; Yoshikawa T; Ohno Y; Suganuma N; Sugimura K
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Aug; 25(7):511-9. PubMed ID: 21670955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and CECT in gastric cancer diagnosis.
Staniuk T; Małkowski B; Śrutek E; Szlęzak P; Zegarski W
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1349-56. PubMed ID: 26826089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
