695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25781441)
21. Deep-learning model to improve histological grading and predict upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia / ductal carcinoma in situ on breast biopsy.
Huang CY; Chang RF; Lin CY; Hsieh MS; Liao PC; Wang YJ; Kao YC; Porta L; Lin PY; Lee CC; Lee YH
Histopathology; 2024 May; 84(6):983-1002. PubMed ID: 38288642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of Digital Pathologic Analysis vs Traditional Microscopy in the Interpretation of Melanocytic Lesions.
Onega T; Barnhill RL; Piepkorn MW; Longton GM; Elder DE; Weinstock MA; Knezevich SR; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Nelson HD; Radick AC; Elmore JG
JAMA Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 154(10):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 30140929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Consultation in breast surgical pathology: interobserver diagnostic variability of atypical intraductal proliferative lesions].
Perez AA; Balabram D; Salles Mde A; Gobbi H
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 35(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 23752581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: diagnostic agreement and management implications.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2016 Nov; 69(5):862-870. PubMed ID: 27270947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Bordering on Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Tozbikian G; Brogi E; Vallejo CE; Giri D; Murray M; Catalano J; Olcese C; Van Zee KJ; Wen HY
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 25(2):100-107. PubMed ID: 27481892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Randomized Study Comparing Digital Imaging to Traditional Glass Slide Microscopy for Breast Biopsy and Cancer Diagnosis.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Pepe MS; Carney PA; Nelson HD; Allison KH; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Mercan E; Shapiro LG; Brunyé TT; Morgan TR; Weaver DL
J Pathol Inform; 2017; 8():12. PubMed ID: 28382226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic concordance of breast pathologists: lessons from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Pathology External Quality Assurance Scheme.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Aleskandarany MA; Hodi Z; Lee AH; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2017 Mar; 70(4):632-642. PubMed ID: 28028831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Atypia on breast core needle biopsies: reproducibility and significance.
Darvishian F; Singh B; Simsir A; Ye W; Cangiarella JF
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19667411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the
Elmore JG; Elder DE; Barnhill RL; Knezevich SR; Longton GM; Titus LJ; Weinstock MA; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Reisch LM; Radick AC; Piepkorn MW
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 May; 1(1):. PubMed ID: 30556054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Onega T; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953. PubMed ID: 28465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation.
Elder DE; Piepkorn MW; Barnhill RL; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Knezevich SR; Pepe MS; Carney PA; Titus LJ; Onega T; Tosteson ANA; Weinstock MA; Elmore JG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Jul; 79(1):52-59.e5. PubMed ID: 29524584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Papillomas and atypical papillomas in breast core needle biopsy specimens: risk of carcinoma in subsequent excision.
Renshaw AA; Derhagopian RP; Tizol-Blanco DM; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Aug; 122(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 15323138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monitoring of interobserver agreement in nuclear atypia scoring of node-negative breast carcinomas judged at individual collaborating hospitals in the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) protocol.
Tsuda H; Akiyama F; Kurosumi M; Sakamoto G; Watanabe T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):413-20. PubMed ID: 10563193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Atypia in breast pathology: what pathologists need to know.
Katayama A; Toss MS; Parkin M; Ellis IO; Quinn C; Rakha EA
Pathology; 2022 Feb; 54(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 34872753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Should pathologists send all or only selected slides for patient-requested interlaboratory second opinion?
Renshaw MA; Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):763-6. PubMed ID: 19846819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs.
Tosteson ANA; Yang Q; Nelson HD; Longton G; Soneji SS; Pepe M; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Elmore JG; Weaver DL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 28879558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Alghamdi SA; Krishnamurthy K; Garces Narvaez SA; Algashaamy KJ; Aoun J; Reis IM; Recine MA; Jorda M; Poppiti RJ; Gomez-Fernandez CR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 153(3):360-367. PubMed ID: 31769792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions?
Masood S; Loya A; Khalbuss W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 12768640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast pathology review: does it make a difference?
Romanoff AM; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz CR; Jaffer SM; Nagi CS; Bleiweiss IJ; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3504-8. PubMed ID: 24859936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
