These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25782186)

  • 1. Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.
    Sander U; Emmert M; Dickel J; Meszmer N; Kolb B
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e68. PubMed ID: 25782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do German hospital report cards have the potential to improve the quality of care?
    Emmert M; Hessemer S; Meszmer N; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2014 Dec; 118(3):386-95. PubMed ID: 25074783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public reporting of hospital quality shows inconsistent ranking results.
    Emmert M; Taheri-Zadeh F; Kolb B; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2017 Jan; 121(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 27890391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Do laymen understand information about hospital quality? An empirical verification using risk-adjusted mortality rates as an example].
    Sander U; Kolb B; Taheri F; Patzelt C; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Nov; 127-128():21-29. PubMed ID: 29107649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?
    Emmert M; Schlesinger M
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 52(3):933-958. PubMed ID: 27324087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating quality of care information to physicians: a study of eight presentation formats.
    Geraedts M; Hermeling P; de Cruppé W
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 22177585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding.
    Damman OC; De Jong A; Hibbard JH; Timmermans DR
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Nov; 25(11):860-869. PubMed ID: 26543066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What factors determine the intention to use hospital report cards? The perspectives of users and non-users.
    Emmert M; Wiener M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Jul; 100(7):1394-1401. PubMed ID: 28189471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.
    Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Text Comprehensibility of Hospital Report Cards].
    Sander U; Kolb B; Christoph C; Emmert M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Dec; 78(12):828-834. PubMed ID: 25806505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.
    Kolb B; Emmert M; Sander U; Patzelt C; Schöffski O
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Nov; 137-138():42-53. PubMed ID: 30190204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
    Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study.
    Emmert M; Kast K; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2019 Nov; 123(11):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 31383371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.
    Emmert M; Schlesinger M
    Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):729-738. PubMed ID: 28447273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Better-than-average and worse-than-average hospitals may not significantly differ from average hospitals: an analysis of Medicare Hospital Compare ratings.
    Paddock SM; Adams JL; Hoces de la Guardia F
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Feb; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25394546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Internet-based Report Cards for Hospital Choice Making in Germany: A Clinical Area-focused Perspective].
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Simon A; Sander U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Nov; 78(11):721-734. PubMed ID: 26021370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.
    Shi Y; Scanlon DP; Bhandari N; Christianson JB
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Aug; 52(4):1570-1589. PubMed ID: 27468943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of hospital report cards based on administrative data.
    Glance LG; Dick AW; Osler TM; Mukamel DB
    Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 41(4 Pt 1):1413-37. PubMed ID: 16899015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.