These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2578363)

  • 41. The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) component N1.
    Jacobson GP; Lombardi DM; Gibbens ND; Ahmad BK; Newman CW
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 1487089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Asymmetry of temporal auditory T-complex: right ear-left hemisphere advantage in Tb timing in children.
    Bruneau N; Bidet-Caulet A; Roux S; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Gomot M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 25093904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Effects of monaural and binaural stimulation on middle latency auditory evoked responses].
    Báez-Martín MM; Cabrera-Abreu I
    Rev Neurol; 2000 Jul 1-15; 31(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10948576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interaural delay-dependent changes in the binaural difference potential of the human auditory brain stem response.
    Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):5-19. PubMed ID: 16762518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing middle latency response with and without music.
    Eisencraft T; de Miranda MF; Schochat E
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 72(4):465-9. PubMed ID: 17143424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
    Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues.
    Starr A; McPherson D; Patterson J; Don M; Luxford W; Shannon R; Sininger Y; Tonakawa L; Waring M
    Brain; 1991 Jun; 114 ( Pt 3)():1157-80. PubMed ID: 2065245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Binaural interactions of electrically and acoustically evoked responses recorded from the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs.
    Noh H; Abbas PJ; Abbas CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jun; 46(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 17530515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Binaural interaction in the brain-stem auditory evoked potential: evidence for a delay line coincidence detection mechanism.
    Jones SJ; Van der Poel JC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 1691974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Binaural masking level difference in human binaural interaction components.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 9657597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of repetition rate on middle latency auditory evoked potentials in humans.
    Versino M; Canegalli F; Bergamaschi R; Callieco R; Cosi V
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1991 Jan; 67(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 1888476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem response compared for tone-pips and rectangular clicks under conditions of auditory and visual attention.
    Ikeda K
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():27-34. PubMed ID: 25776741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Cortical mechanisms of auditive perception in man: contribution of cerebral potentials and evoked magnetic fields by auditive stimulations].
    Liégeois-Chauvel C; Laguitton V; Badier JM; Schwartz D; Chauvel P
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1995; 151(8-9):495-504. PubMed ID: 8578070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Are chirps better than clicks and tonebursts for evoking middle latency responses?
    Atcherson SR; Moore PC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 25313547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conditioned attenuation of dolphin monaural and binaural auditory evoked potentials after preferential stimulation of one ear.
    Finneran JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2302. PubMed ID: 32359288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials elicited from monaural versus binaural acoustic stimulations.
    Wang SJ; Jaw FS; Young YH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):420-3. PubMed ID: 19097934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.