These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2578363)

  • 61. Human frequency-following responses to monaural and binaural stimuli.
    Gerken GM; Moushegian G; Stillman RD; Rupert AL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Apr; 38(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 46818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Frequency dependence of binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem and middle latency responses.
    Fowler CG; Horn JH
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 22718323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Three-channel Lissajous' trajectory of the binaural interaction components in human auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 7523083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A study of auditory middle latency responses in relation to electrode combinations and stimulus conditions.
    Kadobayashi I; Kira Y; Toyoshima A; Nishijima H
    Audiology; 1984; 23(5):509-19. PubMed ID: 6487148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. An intrasubject comparison of electric and acoustic middle latency responses.
    Kileny PR; Kemink JL; Miller JM
    Am J Otol; 1989 Jan; 10(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2524165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Rate, frequency, and intensity effects on early auditory evoked potentials and binaural interaction component in humans.
    Parthasarathy TK; Moushegian G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jul; 4(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 8369540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Identification and separation of acoustic frequency following responses (FFRS) in man.
    Sohmer H; Pratt H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1977 Apr; 42(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 66132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Age-Related Changes in Binaural Interaction at Brainstem Level.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Beynon AJ; Dhooge IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 26881979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Scalp potentials following sudden coherence and discoherence of binaural noise and change in the inter-aural time difference: a specific binaural evoked potential or a "mismatch" response?
    Jones SJ; Pitman JR; Halliday AM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 1707806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Auditory evoked potentials from the primary auditory cortex of the cat: topographic and pharmacological studies.
    Knight RT; Brailowsky S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 1691975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of evoked potentials and high-frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in rat auditory cortex.
    Franowicz MN; Barth DS
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Jul; 74(1):96-112. PubMed ID: 7472356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The timing of the processes underlying lateralization: psychophysical and evoked potential measures.
    McEvoy LK; Picton TW; Champagne SC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):389-98. PubMed ID: 1797606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Intracranial electroencephalography power and phase synchronization changes during monaural and binaural beat stimulation.
    Becher AK; Höhne M; Axmacher N; Chaieb L; Elger CE; Fell J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 41(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 25345689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Suppression of the P(b) (P(1)) component of the auditory middle latency response with contralateral masking.
    Özdamar Ö; Bohórquez J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 119(8):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 18467167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation.
    Lazzouni L; Ross B; Voss P; Lepore F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 20005163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Middle latency auditory evoked responses in normal term infants: a longitudinal study.
    Rogers SH; Edwards DA; Henderson-Smart DJ; Pettigrew AG
    Neuropediatrics; 1989 May; 20(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 2739875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Recording action potentials with a latency period of 12-50 msec after acoustic stimulus in persons with normal hearing].
    Pruszewicz A; Swidziński P
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1984; 38(5):431-40. PubMed ID: 6522067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Auditory brain stem potentials in monkey (M. mulatta) and man.
    Allen AR; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Jul; 45(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 78822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.