241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25784154)
21. Comparison of the long-term skeletal stability between a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system following BSSO advancement - a cohort study based on a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
van Bakelen NB; Boermans BD; Buijs GJ; Jansma J; Pruim GJ; Hoppenreijs TJ; Bergsma JE; Stegenga B; Bos RR
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 52(8):721-8. PubMed ID: 25138611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation using computed tomography.
Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Okabe K; Nakagawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19375019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Maxillary stability following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a comparative study between titanium miniplate and poly-L-lactic acid plate.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 64(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 16360860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia between hybrid fixation and conventional fixation following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Ishihara Y; Sotobori M; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Yoshizawa K; Marukawa K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1808-12. PubMed ID: 25048048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized clinical trial of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery.
Buijs GJ; van Bakelen NB; Jansma J; de Visscher JG; Hoppenreijs TJ; Bergsma JE; Stegenga B; Bos RR
J Dent Res; 2012 Mar; 91(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 22269272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in condylar long axis and skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with poly-L-lactic acid or titanium plate fixation.
Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Takazakura D; Shimada M; Takatsuka S; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):627-34. PubMed ID: 15878821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.
De Oliveira LB; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Oguz Y; Pereira-Filho VA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 27068853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Caldas RA; Goulart DR; Hemerson de Moraes P; Olate S; Ricardo Barão VA; Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 30718216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of a T-shaped miniplate fixation of a modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy with buccal step, a new technique for mandibular orthognathic surgery.
Aymach Z; Nei H; Kawamura H; Bell W
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 20580286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Altuncu F; Kazan D; Özden B
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e553-e561. PubMed ID: 37823299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery: a two-year multi-center randomized controlled trial.
van Bakelen NB; Buijs GJ; Jansma J; de Visscher JG; Hoppenreijs TJ; Bergsma JE; Stegenga B; Bos RR
J Dent Res; 2013 Dec; 92(12):1100-5. PubMed ID: 24130219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: assessment of 9 methods via finite element method.
Bohluli B; Motamedi MH; Bohluli P; Sarkarat F; Moharamnejad N; Tabrizi MH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2765-9. PubMed ID: 20708317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
