These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25785195)
1. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series. Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot assisted surgery in gynaecologic oncology - starting a program and initial learning curve from a UK tertiary referral centre: the Guildford perspective. Madhuri TK; Hamzawala I; Tailor A; Butler-Manuel S Int J Med Robot; 2012 Dec; 8(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 23086802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21194735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital. Mäenpää M; Nieminen K; Tomás E; Luukkaala T; Mäenpää JU Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 25721212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting. Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic surgery for early endometrial cancer. Bennich G; Rudnicki M; Lassen PD Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Aug; 95(8):894-900. PubMed ID: 27100141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer. Li XL; Du DF; Jiang H Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 27667447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis. Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy. Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]