These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25786433)

  • 1. Mutation bias, rather than binding preference, underlies the nucleosome-associated G+C% variation in eukaryotes.
    Xing K; He X
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Mar; 7(4):1033-8. PubMed ID: 25786433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nucleosomes suppress spontaneous mutations base-specifically in eukaryotes.
    Chen X; Chen Z; Chen H; Su Z; Yang J; Lin F; Shi S; He X
    Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1235-8. PubMed ID: 22403392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nucleosomal organization and DNA base composition patterns.
    García A; González S; Antequera F
    Nucleus; 2017 Sep; 8(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 28635365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferential nucleosome occupancy at high values of DNA helical rise.
    Pedone F; Santoni D
    DNA Res; 2012; 19(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 22233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training-free atomistic prediction of nucleosome occupancy.
    Minary P; Levitt M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Apr; 111(17):6293-8. PubMed ID: 24733939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical spectral analysis of periodicity in nucleosomal DNA.
    Jin H; Rube HT; Song JS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Mar; 44(5):2047-57. PubMed ID: 26893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequence-dependent nucleosome structure and stability variations detected by Förster resonance energy transfer.
    Kelbauskas L; Chan N; Bash R; Yodh J; Woodbury N; Lohr D
    Biochemistry; 2007 Feb; 46(8):2239-48. PubMed ID: 17269656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of nucleosome occupancy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using position-correlation scoring function.
    Xing Y; Zhao X; Cai L
    Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 21839161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning.
    Chung HR; Vingron M
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 386(5):1411-22. PubMed ID: 19070622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequence-dependent nucleosome formation in trinucleotide repeats evaluated by in vivo chemical mapping.
    Katsumata K; Ichikawa Y; Fuse T; Kurumizaka H; Yanagida A; Urano T; Kato H; Shimizu M
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2021 Jun; 556():179-184. PubMed ID: 33839413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-range correlations between DNA bending sites: relation to the structure and dynamics of nucleosomes.
    Audit B; Vaillant C; Arneodo A; d'Aubenton-Carafa Y; Thermes C
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Mar; 316(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 11884131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nucleosome acetylation sequencing to study the establishment of chromatin acetylation.
    Mittal C; Blacketer MJ; Shogren-Knaak MA
    Anal Biochem; 2014 Jul; 457():51-8. PubMed ID: 24769374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sin mutations alter inherent nucleosome mobility.
    Flaus A; Rencurel C; Ferreira H; Wiechens N; Owen-Hughes T
    EMBO J; 2004 Jan; 23(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 14726954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulations of SIN mutations and histone variants in human nucleosomes reveal altered protein-DNA and core histone interactions.
    Vijayalakshmi M; Shivashankar GV; Sowdhamini R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2007 Dec; 25(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 17937483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary footprints of nucleosome positions in yeast.
    Washietl S; Machné R; Goldman N
    Trends Genet; 2008 Dec; 24(12):583-7. PubMed ID: 18951646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The molecular evolution of nucleosome positioning through sequence-dependent deformation of the DNA polymer.
    Babbitt GA; Tolstorukov MY; Kim Y
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2010 Jun; 27(6):765-80. PubMed ID: 20232932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational analysis suggests a highly bendable, fragile structure for nucleosomal DNA.
    Nozaki T; Yachie N; Ogawa R; Saito R; Tomita M
    Gene; 2011 May; 476(1-2):10-4. PubMed ID: 21338662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide in vitro reconstitution of yeast chromatin with in vivo-like nucleosome positioning.
    Krietenstein N; Wippo CJ; Lieleg C; Korber P
    Methods Enzymol; 2012; 513():205-32. PubMed ID: 22929771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active nucleosome positioning beyond intrinsic biophysics is revealed by in vitro reconstitution.
    Korber P
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2012 Apr; 40(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 22435815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy.
    Tillo D; Hughes TR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():442. PubMed ID: 20028554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.