These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25786957)

  • 1. Divided attention disrupts perceptual encoding during speech recognition.
    Mattys SL; Palmer SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1464-72. PubMed ID: 25786957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
    Janse E; Newman RS
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception.
    Mattys SL; Barden K; Samuel AG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):748-54. PubMed ID: 24189992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multitasking During Degraded Speech Recognition in School-Age Children.
    Grieco-Calub TM; Ward KM; Brehm L
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216516686786. PubMed ID: 28105890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.
    Strand JF; Sommers MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1663-72. PubMed ID: 21895103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior paracingulate and cingulate cortex mediates the effects of cognitive load on speech sound discrimination.
    Gennari SP; Millman RE; Hymers M; Mattys SL
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():735-743. PubMed ID: 29902588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Got rhythm…for better and for worse. Cross-modal effects of auditory rhythm on visual word recognition.
    Brochard R; Tassin M; Zagar D
    Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults.
    Gygi B; Shafiro V
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():76-86. PubMed ID: 24530609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1888-98. PubMed ID: 25920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing motivation changes subjective reports of listening effort and choice of coping strategy.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 24597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.