These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25787264)

  • 1. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Willett W; Tinker LF; Subar AF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Arab L; Prentice RL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 25787264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the 24-Hour Recall as a Reference Instrument for Calibrating Other Self-Report Instruments in Nutritional Cohort Studies: Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Willett W; Tinker LF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Baer DJ; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28402488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Arab L; Baer DJ; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Schatzkin A; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 180(2):172-88. PubMed ID: 24918187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining a Food Frequency Questionnaire With 24-Hour Recalls to Increase the Precision of Estimation of Usual Dietary Intakes-Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project.
    Freedman LS; Midthune D; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF; Willett W; Neuhouser ML; Tinker LF; Kipnis V
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 187(10):2227-2232. PubMed ID: 29917051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers.
    Park Y; Dodd KW; Kipnis V; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Schoeller DA; Baer DJ; Midthune D; Troiano RP; Bowles H; Subar AF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jan; 107(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29381789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall web application against urinary recovery biomarkers in a sample of French-speaking adults of the province of Québec, Canada.
    Paradis F; Lamarche B; Robitaille J; Couillard C; Lafrenière J; Tremblay AJ; Corneau L; Lemieux S
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2022 Feb; 47(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 35057638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement error corrected sodium and potassium intake estimation using 24-hour urinary excretion.
    Huang Y; Van Horn L; Tinker LF; Neuhouser ML; Carbone L; Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Thomas F; Prentice RL
    Hypertension; 2014 Feb; 63(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 24277763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of Absolute Intake and Nutrient Density of Protein, Potassium, and Sodium Assessed by Various Dietary Assessment Methods: An Exploratory Study.
    Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hulshof PJM; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Hollman PCH; van Dijk G; Feskens EJM; de Vries JHM
    Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement Error Affecting Web- and Paper-Based Dietary Assessment Instruments: Insights From the Multi-Cohort Eating and Activity Study for Understanding Reporting Error.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Troiano RP; Barrett B; Cunningham C; Subar AF; Park Y; Bowles HR; Freedman LS; Kipnis V; Rimm EB; Willett WC; Potischman N; Spielgelman D; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Dodd KW
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1125-1139. PubMed ID: 35136928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying recovery biomarkers to calibrate self-report measures of sodium and potassium in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
    Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Sotres-Alvarez D; Wong WW; Loria CM; Gellman MD; Van Horn L; Alderman MH; Beasley JM; Lora CM; Siega-Riz AM; Kaplan RC; Shaw PA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 31(7):462-473. PubMed ID: 28205551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difference between 24-h diet recall and urine excretion for assessing population sodium and potassium intake in adults aged 18-39 y.
    Mercado CI; Cogswell ME; Valderrama AL; Wang CY; Loria CM; Moshfegh AJ; Rhodes DG; Carriquiry AL
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Feb; 101(2):376-86. PubMed ID: 25646336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.
    Subar AF; Kipnis V; Troiano RP; Midthune D; Schoeller DA; Bingham S; Sharbaugh CO; Trabulsi J; Runswick S; Ballard-Barbash R; Sunshine J; Schatzkin A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12835280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of dietary taste patterns as assessed by FFQ against 24-h recalls and biomarkers of exposure.
    van Langeveld AWB; Teo PS; Mars M; Feskens EJM; de Graaf C; de Vries JHM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2019 Jan; 73(1):132-140. PubMed ID: 30254242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a New Statistical Model for Measurement Error to the Evaluation of Dietary Self-report Instruments.
    Freedman LS; Midthune D; Carroll RJ; Commins JM; Arab L; Baer DJ; Moler JE; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Rhodes D; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W; Kipnis V
    Epidemiology; 2015 Nov; 26(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 26360372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of women's diet assessed by FFQs and 24-hour recalls with and without underreporters: associations with biomarkers.
    Olafsdottir AS; Thorsdottir I; Gunnarsdottir I; Thorgeirsdottir H; Steingrimsdottir L
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2006; 50(5):450-60. PubMed ID: 16877864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The degree of misreporting of the energy-adjusted intake of protein, potassium, and sodium does not differ among under-, acceptable, and over-reporters of energy intake.
    Murakami K; Sasaki S; Uenishi K;
    Nutr Res; 2012 Oct; 32(10):741-50. PubMed ID: 23146770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Availability of two self-administered diet history questionnaires for pregnant Japanese women: A validation study using 24-hour urinary markers.
    Shiraishi M; Haruna M; Matsuzaki M; Murayama R; Sasaki S
    J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):172-179. PubMed ID: 28142045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does dietary recall adequately assess sodium, potassium, and calcium intake in hypertensive patients?
    Leiba A; Vald A; Peleg E; Shamiss A; Grossman E
    Nutrition; 2005 Apr; 21(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 15811766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.