451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25789883)
1. Predictors of Conversion from Radial Into Femoral Access in Cardiac Catheterization.
Carvalho MS; Calé R; Gonçalves Pde A; Vinhas H; Raposo L; Teles R; Martins C; Gabriel HM; Pereira H; Almeida M
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2015 May; 104(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 25789883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).
Gellen B; Lesault PF; Canouï-Poitrine F; Champagne S; Mouillet G; Pongas D; Le Thuaut A; Jakljevic T; Boudiche S; de la Vega M; Maalej A; Veugeois A; Dubois-Randé JL; Teiger E
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1056-61. PubMed ID: 23159410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transitioning to the radial artery as the preferred access site for cardiac catheterization: an academic medical center experience.
Turner S; Sacrinty M; Manogue M; Little W; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Applegate R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 80(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 22162430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.
Ziakas AG; Koskinas KC; Gavrilidis S; Giannoglou GD; Hadjimiltiades S; Gourassas I; Theofilogiannakos E; Economou F; Styliadis I
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20882651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Benefits Conferred by Radial Access for Cardiac Catheterization Are Offset by a Paradoxical Increase in the Rate of Vascular Access Site Complications With Femoral Access: The Campeau Radial Paradox.
Azzalini L; Tosin K; Chabot-Blanchet M; Avram R; Ly HQ; Gaudet B; Gallo R; Doucet S; Tanguay JF; Ibrahim R; Grégoire JC; Crépeau J; Bonan R; de Guise P; Nosair M; Dorval JF; Gosselin G; L'Allier PL; Guertin MC; Asgar AW; Jolicœur EM
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(14):1854-64. PubMed ID: 26604063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study.
Rathore S; Stables RH; Pauriah M; Hakeem A; Mills JD; Palmer ND; Perry RA; Morris JL
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 May; 3(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 20488402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardized radial approach reduces access site complications: a prospective observational registry.
Markovic S; Imhof A; Kunze M; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Jan; 26(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 25211653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.
Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures.
Feldkamp T; Luedemann M; Spehlmann ME; Freitag-Wolf S; Gaensbacher J; Schulte K; Bajrovic A; Hinzmann D; Hippe HJ; Kunzendorf U; Frey N; Luedde M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 107(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28939956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure.
de Andrade PB; Tebet MA; Nogueira EF; Esteves VC; de Andrade MV; Labrunie A; Piva e Mattos LA
Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 23067902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients undergoing PCI from the femoral route by default radial operators are at high risk of vascular access-site complications.
Rafie IM; Uddin MM; Ossei-Gerning N; Anderson RA; Kinnaird TD
EuroIntervention; 2014 Feb; 9(10):1189-94. PubMed ID: 24561736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Routledge HC; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 23453099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: Results of the Study of Access Site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women quality-of-life substudy.
Hess CN; Krucoff MW; Sheng S; Anstrom KJ; Barham WB; Gilchrist IC; Harrington RA; Jacobs AK; Mehran R; Messenger JC; Mark DB; Rao SV
Am Heart J; 2015 Aug; 170(2):371-9. PubMed ID: 26299236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of 1,826 consecutive procedures.
Guédès A; Dangoisse V; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Sep; 22(9):391-7. PubMed ID: 20814043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transradial right and left heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach.
Gilchrist IC; Moyer CD; Gascho JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Apr; 67(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 16532498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
