These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25790120)

  • 1. The Influence of Hospital Volume on Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.
    Gietelink L; Henneman D; van Leersum NJ; de Noo M; Manusama E; Tanis PJ; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW;
    Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 25790120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.
    Jonker FHW; Hagemans JAW; Burger JWA; Verhoef C; Borstlap WAA; Tanis PJ;
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1741-1747. PubMed ID: 28884251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.
    Gietelink L; Wouters MW; Tanis PJ; Deken MM; Ten Berge MG; Tollenaar RA; van Krieken JH; de Noo ME;
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2015 Sep; 13(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 26358795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in circumferential resection margin involvement after abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection no longer significant.
    van Leersum N; Martijnse I; den Dulk M; Kolfschoten N; Le Cessie S; van de Velde C; Tollenaar R; Wouters M; Rutten HJ
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jun; 259(6):1150-5. PubMed ID: 24096756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter study of outcome in relation to the type of resection in rectal cancer.
    Ortiz H; Wibe A; Ciga MA; Kreisler E; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jul; 57(7):811-22. PubMed ID: 24901681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in circumferential resection margin: Reporting and involvement in the South-Netherlands.
    Homan J; Bökkerink GM; Aarts MJ; Lemmens VE; van Lijnschoten G; Rutten HJ; Wijsman JH; Nagtegaal ID; de Wilt JH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1485-92. PubMed ID: 26251342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands.
    van Erning FN; van Steenbergen LN; van den Broek WT; Rutten HJ; Lemmens VE
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1199-206. PubMed ID: 24044806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of hospital volume on perioperative outcomes of rectal cancer.
    Jonker FHW; Hagemans JAW; Verhoef C; Burger JWA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1894-1900. PubMed ID: 28822603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
    Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery.
    Atkinson SJ; Daly MC; Midura EF; Etzioni DA; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Davis BR; Paquette IM
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 204(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 27451863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer.
    Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G; Norman AR; Moran BJ; Heald RJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Jun; 31(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 17468974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Permanent stoma rates: a misleading marker of quality in rectal cancer surgery.
    Codd RJ; Evans MD; Davies M; Harris DA; Chandrasekaran TV; Khot UP; Morgan AR; Beynon J
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Apr; 16(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 24299162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
    Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk Factors Associated With Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Rectal Cancer: A Binational Registry Study.
    Warrier SK; Kong JC; Guerra GR; Chittleborough TJ; Naik A; Ramsay RG; Lynch AC; Heriot AG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 29521824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer.
    Shin DW; Shin JY; Oh SJ; Park JK; Yu H; Ahn MS; Bae KB; Hong KH; Ji YI
    Am Surg; 2016 Apr; 82(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 27097629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin - a root cause analysis.
    Youssef H; Collantes EC; Rashid SH; Wong LS; Baragwanath P
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jun; 11(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 18637930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
    Birbeck KF; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons W; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Abbott CR; Scott N; Finan PJ; Johnston D; Quirke P
    Ann Surg; 2002 Apr; 235(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 11923599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple criteria to predict margin involvement after chemoradiotherapy and sphincter-sparing for low rectal cancer.
    Dumont F; Tilly C; Dartigues P; Goéré D; Honoré C; Elias D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1210-6. PubMed ID: 26108736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.