These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25790576)

  • 1. Team members' interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness: a catastrophic relationship?
    Naber AM; McDonald JN; Asenuga OA; Arthur W
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):163-76. PubMed ID: 25790576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the utility of experiential cross-training for team decision-making under time stress.
    McCann C; Baranski JV; Thompson MM; Pigeau RA
    Ergonomics; 2000 Aug; 43(8):1095-110. PubMed ID: 10975175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments.
    Salas E; Cooke NJ; Rosen MA
    Hum Factors; 2008 Jun; 50(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 18689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linguistic correlates of team performance: toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions.
    Fischer U; McDonnell L; Orasanu J
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B86-95. PubMed ID: 17547309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Team members' and supervisors' ratings of team performance: a case of inconsistency.
    Kline TJ
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1015-22. PubMed ID: 11597047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of team empowerment on proactivity: the moderating roles of leader's emotional intelligence and proactive personality.
    Erkutlu H; Chafra J
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(4-5):560-77. PubMed ID: 23115905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of individual and dyadic training protocols: the influence of trainee interaction anxiety.
    Arthur W; Young B; Jordan JA; Shebilske WL
    Hum Factors; 1996 Mar; 38(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 8682520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators.
    Breuer C; Hüffmeier J; Hertel G
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Aug; 101(8):1151-77. PubMed ID: 27228105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From similitude to success: The effects of facial resemblance on perceptions of team effectiveness.
    Wang Z; He X; Liu F
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Mar; 22(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 26752512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality.
    LePine JA
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Feb; 88(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 12675392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Importance of Team Sex Composition in Team-Training Research Employing Complex Psychomotor Tasks.
    Jarrett SM; Glaze RM; Schurig I; Arthur W
    Hum Factors; 2017 Aug; 59(5):833-843. PubMed ID: 28128988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis.
    Salas E; DiazGranados D; Klein C; Burke CS; Stagl KC; Goodwin GF; Halpin SM
    Hum Factors; 2008 Dec; 50(6):903-33. PubMed ID: 19292013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using brain-based measures to compose teams: how individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance.
    Woolley AW; Hackman JR; Jerde TE; Chabris CF; Bennett SL; Kosslyn SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2007; 2(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 18633809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When do bad apples not spoil the barrel? Negative relationships in teams, team performance, and buffering mechanisms.
    de Jong JP; Curşeu PL; Leenders RT
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 May; 99(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 24661274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When opposites attract: a multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion.
    Kristof-Brown A; Barrick MR; Stevens CK
    J Pers; 2005 Aug; 73(4):935-57. PubMed ID: 15958140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring team cohesion: observations from the science.
    Salas E; Grossman R; Hughes AM; Coultas CW
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 25875429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive diversity and team performance in a complex multiple task environment.
    Sauer J; Felsing T; Franke H; Rüttinger B
    Ergonomics; 2006 Aug; 49(10):934-54. PubMed ID: 16803725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness.
    Shaw JD; Zhu J; Duffy MK; Scott KL; Shih HA; Susanto E
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Mar; 96(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 20939655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A typology for health care teams.
    Andreatta PB
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2010; 35(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 20844359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do leader-member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model.
    Li AN; Liao H
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Sep; 99(5):847-66. PubMed ID: 25000359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.