These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25790784)

  • 1. Grid-Assembly: An oligonucleotide composition-based partitioning strategy to aid metagenomic sequence assembly.
    Ghosh TS; Mehra V; Mande SS
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541004. PubMed ID: 25790784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MetaCAA: A clustering-aided methodology for efficient assembly of metagenomic datasets.
    Reddy RM; Mohammed MH; Mande SS
    Genomics; 2014; 103(2-3):161-8. PubMed ID: 24607570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes.
    Olson ND; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Cepeda-Espinoza V; Ghurye J; Koren S; Pop M
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 28968737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.
    Bose T; Haque MM; Reddy C; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142102. PubMed ID: 26561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
    Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical evaluation of 11 de novo assemblers in metagenome assembly.
    Forouzan E; Shariati P; Mousavi Maleki MS; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Aug; 151():99-105. PubMed ID: 29953874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BIGMAC : breaking inaccurate genomes and merging assembled contigs for long read metagenomic assembly.
    Lam KK; Hall R; Clum A; Rao S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):435. PubMed ID: 27793084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast and simple protein-alignment-guided assembly of orthologous gene families from microbiome sequencing reads.
    Huson DH; Tappu R; Bazinet AL; Xie C; Cummings MP; Nieselt K; Williams R
    Microbiome; 2017 Jan; 5(1):11. PubMed ID: 28122610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly.
    Charuvaka A; Rangwala H
    BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. PubMed ID: 21989307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
    Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating metagenomics tools for genome binning with real metagenomic datasets and CAMI datasets.
    Yue Y; Huang H; Qi Z; Dou HM; Liu XY; Han TF; Chen Y; Song XJ; Zhang YH; Tu J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):334. PubMed ID: 32723290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. InteMAP: Integrated metagenomic assembly pipeline for NGS short reads.
    Lai B; Wang F; Wang X; Duan L; Zhu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():244. PubMed ID: 26250558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
    Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A de novo metagenomic assembly program for shotgun DNA reads.
    Lai B; Ding R; Li Y; Duan L; Zhu H
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(11):1455-62. PubMed ID: 22495746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Graph mining for next generation sequencing: leveraging the assembly graph for biological insights.
    Warnke-Sommer J; Ali H
    BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():340. PubMed ID: 27154001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolving prokaryotic taxonomy without rRNA: longer oligonucleotide word lengths improve genome and metagenome taxonomic classification.
    Alsop EB; Raymond J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67337. PubMed ID: 23840870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GRASPx: efficient homolog-search of short peptide metagenome database through simultaneous alignment and assembly.
    Zhong C; Yang Y; Yooseph S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):283. PubMed ID: 27585568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved assemblies using a source-agnostic pipeline for MetaGenomic Assembly by Merging (MeGAMerge) of contigs.
    Scholz M; Lo CC; Chain PS
    Sci Rep; 2014 Oct; 4():6480. PubMed ID: 25270300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.