1721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25791423)
1. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Reoperative Repair for Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: An Updated Series.
Jacobson DL; Shannon R; Johnson EK; Gong EM; Liu DB; Flink CC; Meyer T; Cheng EY; Lindgren BW
J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 30395839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants.
Avery DI; Herbst KW; Lendvay TS; Noh PH; Dangle P; Gundeti MS; Steele MC; Corbett ST; Peters CA; Kim C
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):139.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26052000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reoperative Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children: Safety and Efficacy of the Technique.
Moscardi PR; Barbosa JA; Andrade HS; Mello MF; Cezarino BN; Oliveira LM; Srougi M; Dénes FT; Lopes RI
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):798-804. PubMed ID: 27789217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
Menon P; Rao KL; Sodhi KS; Bhattacharya A; Saxena AK; Mittal BR
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The laparoscopic pyeloplasty: is there a role in the age of robotics?
Reddy MN; Nerli RB
Urol Clin North Am; 2015 Feb; 42(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 25455171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery.
Piaggio LA; Noh PH; González R
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1878-82. PubMed ID: 17437840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
Andolfi C; Rodríguez VM; Galansky L; Gundeti MS
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 34247895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children with giant hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Nerli RB; Reddy MN; Hiremath MB; Shishir D; Patil SM; Guntaka A
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Aug; 8(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 21917524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
Levin BM; Herrell SD
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann KT; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 30007500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Autorino R; Eden C; El-Ghoneimi A; Guazzoni G; Buffi N; Peters CA; Stein RJ; Gettman M
Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):430-52. PubMed ID: 23856037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.
Zhang Y; Ouyang W; Xu H; Luan Y; Yang J; Lu Y; Hu J; Liu Z; Yu X; Guan W; Hu Z; Ye Z; Wang S; Li H
Urol Int; 2019; 103(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 31537001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
