1725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25791423)
21. Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
Hopf HL; Bahler CD; Sundaram CP
Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():106-10. PubMed ID: 26801810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.
Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience.
Palese MA; Stifelman MD; Munver R; Sosa RE; Philipps CK; Dinlenc C; Del Pizzo JJ
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15865532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Functional outcomes of early versus delayed pyeloplasty in prenatally diagnosed pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Babu R; Rathish VR; Sai V
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):63.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25837703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot-assisted, single-site, dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with the new da Vinci platform: a stage 2a study.
Buffi NM; Lughezzani G; Fossati N; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni G; Lista G; Larcher A; Abrate A; Fiori C; Cestari A; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol; 2015 Jan; 67(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 24656756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), is an alternative to open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
Cohen S; Raisin G; Dothan D; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1117-1122. PubMed ID: 34859365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Success of Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Approaches to Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Based on Preoperative Renal Function.
Grimsby GM; Jacobs MA; Gargollo PC
J Endourol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):874-7. PubMed ID: 25815580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes.
Mittal S; Aghababian A; Eftekharzadeh S; Dinardo L; Weaver J; Weiss DA; Long C; Srinivasan AK; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):528.e1-528.e7. PubMed ID: 33766473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort.
Bansal D; Cost NG; DeFoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Vanderbrink BA; Alam S; Sheldon CA; Noh PH
J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 24268880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Subotic U; Rohard I; Weber DM; Gobet R; Moehrlen U; Gonzalez R
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Aug; 8(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 21802371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
