201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25791442)
1. Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries' Definitions of Revision.
Liebs TR; Splietker F; Hassenpflug J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3421-30. PubMed ID: 25791442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty.
Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Isolated acetabular liner exchange compared with complete acetabular component revision in revision of primary uncemented acetabular components: a study of 1649 revisions from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Lie SA; Hallan G; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 17540741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome.
Lacny S; Bohm E; Hawker G; Powell J; Marshall DA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):442-51. PubMed ID: 27037425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in the different arthroplasty registries.
Niinimäki TT
Knee; 2015 Mar; 22(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 25596073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morbid Obesity: Increased Risk of Failure After Aseptic Revision TKA.
Watts CD; Wagner ER; Houdek MT; Lewallen DG; Mabry TM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2621-7. PubMed ID: 25845948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patellofemoral crepitus in high flexion rotating platform knee arthroplasty.
Shillington MP; Cashman K; Farmer G
ANZ J Surg; 2013 Oct; 83(10):779-83. PubMed ID: 23590564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of femoral head size on metal-on-HXLPE hip arthroplasty outcome in a combined analysis of six national and regional registries.
Allepuz A; Havelin L; Barber T; Sedrakyan A; Graves S; Bordini B; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):12-8. PubMed ID: 25520414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.
Gulotta LV; Chambers KL; Warren RF; Dines DM; Craig EV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3918-24. PubMed ID: 26354176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology.
Krenn V; Morawietz L; Perino G; Kienapfel H; Ascherl R; Hassenpflug GJ; Thomsen M; Thomas P; Huber M; Kendoff D; Baumhoer D; Krukemeyer MG; Natu S; Boettner F; Zustin J; Kölbel B; Rüther W; Kretzer JP; Tiemann A; Trampuz A; Frommelt L; Tichilow R; Söder S; Müller S; Parvizi J; Illgner U; Gehrke T
Pathol Res Pract; 2014 Dec; 210(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 25454771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision of failed total elbow arthroplasty with use of a linked implant.
Sneftrup SB; Jensen SL; Johannsen HV; Søjbjerg JO
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16365125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes analysis of revision total shoulder replacement.
Dines JS; Fealy S; Strauss EJ; Allen A; Craig EV; Warren RF; Dines DM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jul; 88(7):1494-500. PubMed ID: 16818975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [German Total Ankle Replacement Register of the German Foot and Ankle Society (D. A. F.) - presentation of design and reliability of the data as well as first results].
Kostuj T; Preis M; Walther M; Aghayev E; Krummenauer F; Röder C
Z Orthop Unfall; 2014 Oct; 152(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 25313699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries.
Labek G; Klaus H; Schlichtherle R; Williams A; Agreiter M
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Aug; 32(8):740-5. PubMed ID: 22049859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Letter to the Editor: New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.
Metsemakers WJ; Moriarty TF; Morgenstern M; Kuehl R; Borens O; Kates S; Richards RG; Verhofstad M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2726-2727. PubMed ID: 27687491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
