These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25791447)

  • 1. CORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Nich C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3465-7. PubMed ID: 25791447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CORR Insights(®): Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Rolfson O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3399-400. PubMed ID: 25894809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CORR Insights(®): Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
    Mont MA; Elmallah RK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):399-401. PubMed ID: 26754209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CORR Insights(®): do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?
    Sedel L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3803-5. PubMed ID: 26201423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CORR Insights(®): frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
    Mont MA; Cherian JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3779-80. PubMed ID: 26070778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CORR Insights(®): Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
    Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):421-2. PubMed ID: 26304044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CORR Insights®: Short-term Risk of Revision THA in the Medicare Population Has Not Improved With Time.
    Girard J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):164-5. PubMed ID: 26463569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CORR Insights(®): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.
    Argenson JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 26349441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CORR Insights(®): Backside Wear Is Not Dependent on the Acetabular Socket Design in Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners.
    Nich C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):383-5. PubMed ID: 26260395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CORR Insights®: What is the prognosis of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years and younger?
    Schreurs BW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1526-7. PubMed ID: 24385036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CORR Insights(®): No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.
    Collier JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):456-8. PubMed ID: 26290340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CORR Insights(®): Wear and Osteolysis of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 10 to 14 Years: The Effect of Femoral Head Size.
    D'Antonio JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):372-3. PubMed ID: 26024579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CORR Insights(®): do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?
    Hallab NJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3915-7. PubMed ID: 26463565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
    Amstutz H; Le Duff M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3981-2. PubMed ID: 26354177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reply to letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
    Haughom BD; Erickson BJ; Hellman MD; Jacobs JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3983-4. PubMed ID: 26400250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):300-303. PubMed ID: 27844400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CORR Insights(®): High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA.
    Giori NJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 26407701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.