These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25792412)

  • 21. Drinking water biofilm cohesiveness changes under chlorination or hydrodynamic stress.
    Mathieu L; Bertrand I; Abe Y; Angel E; Block JC; Skali-Lami S; Francius G
    Water Res; 2014 May; 55():175-84. PubMed ID: 24607313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Removal of oral biofilm by sonic phenomena.
    Pitt WG
    Am J Dent; 2005 Oct; 18(5):345-52. PubMed ID: 16335477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coupled CFD-DEM modeling to predict how EPS affects bacterial biofilm deformation, recovery and detachment under flow conditions.
    Xia Y; Jayathilake PG; Li B; Zuliani P; Deehan D; Longyear J; Stoodley P; Chen J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2022 Sep; 119(9):2551-2563. PubMed ID: 35610631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cohesiveness and hydrodynamic properties of young drinking water biofilms.
    Abe Y; Skali-Lami S; Block JC; Francius G
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1155-66. PubMed ID: 22221338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic removal of oral biofilms by bubbles.
    Parini MR; Pitt WG
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2006 Sep; 52(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16870403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations.
    Hariharan P; Giarra M; Reddy V; Day SW; Manning KB; Deutsch S; Stewart SF; Myers MR; Berman MR; Burgreen GW; Paterson EG; Malinauskas RA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):041002. PubMed ID: 21428676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of hydrodynamics on oral biofilm strength.
    Paramonova E; Kalmykowa OJ; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Sharma PK
    J Dent Res; 2009 Oct; 88(10):922-6. PubMed ID: 19783800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduction of saliva-promoted adhesion of Streptococcus mutans MT8148 and dental biofilm development by tragacanth gum and yeast-derived phosphomannan.
    Shimotoyodome A; Kobayashi H; Nakamura J; Tokimitsu I; Hase T; Inoue T; Matsukubo T; Takaesu Y
    Biofouling; 2006; 22(3-4):261-8. PubMed ID: 17290870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Individual vitality pattern of in situ dental biofilms at different locations in the oral cavity.
    Arweiler NB; Hellwig E; Sculean A; Hein N; Auschill TM
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(5):442-7. PubMed ID: 15316188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A microfluidic platform with pH imaging for chemical and hydrodynamic stimulation of intact oral biofilms.
    Gashti MP; Asselin J; Barbeau J; Boudreau D; Greener J
    Lab Chip; 2016 Apr; 16(8):1412-9. PubMed ID: 26956837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mini-review: convection around biofilms.
    Stewart PS
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 22352315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A porous elastic model for bacterial biofilms: application to the simulation of deformation of bacterial biofilms under microfluidic jet impingement.
    Zheng LY; Farnam DS; Homentcovschi D; Sammakia BG
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051003. PubMed ID: 22757491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Hydrodynamics and Stresses in the PhEur/USP Disintegration Tester Under Fed and Fasted Fluid Characteristics.
    Kindgen S; Wachtel H; Abrahamsson B; Langguth P
    J Pharm Sci; 2015 Sep; 104(9):2956-68. PubMed ID: 26017815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longtime behavior of one-dimensional biofilm models with shear dependent detachment rates.
    Abbas F; Sudarsan R; Eberl HJ
    Math Biosci Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):215-39. PubMed ID: 22901062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Removal of oral biofilms by bubbles: the effect of bubble impingement angle and sonic waves.
    Parini MR; Pitt WG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1688-93. PubMed ID: 16383051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional visualization of mixed species biofilm formation together with its substratum.
    Inaba T; Ichihara T; Yawata Y; Toyofuku M; Uchiyama H; Nomura N
    Microbiol Immunol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):589-93. PubMed ID: 23647374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Application of computational fluid dynamics in hemodynamic research of aortic arch].
    Zhang T; Xiong J; Hu XZ; Jia X; Luan SL; Guo W
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 93(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 23660214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of hydrodynamics in USP apparatus 3-the influence of dip rate.
    Perivilli S; Kakhi M; Stippler E
    Pharm Res; 2015 Apr; 32(4):1304-15. PubMed ID: 25407541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study.
    Truscello S; Kerckhofs G; Van Bael S; Pyka G; Schrooten J; Van Oosterwyck H
    Acta Biomater; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1648-58. PubMed ID: 22210520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling of biofilm systems: a review.
    Horn H; Lackner S
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2014; 146():53-76. PubMed ID: 25163572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.