These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794082)

  • 21. Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.
    Papantoniou V; Sotiropoulou E; Valsamaki P; Tsaroucha A; Sotiropoulou M; Ptohis N; Stipsanelli A; Dimitrakakis K; Marinopoulos S; Tsiouris S; Antsaklis A
    Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20143189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology.
    Badan GM; Roveda D; Paito S; Fleury Ede F; Maragno B; Campos MS; Ferreira CA; Ferreira FA
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016; 62(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 27656851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives.
    Lee SE; Kim HY; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Kim GR; Park YV; Moon HJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):8699-8709. PubMed ID: 34196861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. US of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Moon WK; Myung JS; Lee YJ; Park IA; Noh DY; Im JG
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(2):269-80; discussion 280-1. PubMed ID: 11896217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and mammographic findings.
    Zhang M; Lin Q; Su XH; Cui CX; Bian TT; Wang CQ; Zhao J; Li LL; Ma JZ; Huang JL
    Clin Radiol; 2021 Oct; 76(10):787.e1-787.e7. PubMed ID: 34052010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation of sonographic features of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumor grade, and hormone-receptor status.
    Aho M; Irshad A; Ackerman SJ; Lewis M; Leddy R; Pope TL; Campbell AS; Cluver A; Wolf BJ; Cunningham JE
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Jan; 41(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 22996916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between mammographic screening intervals and size and histology of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Carlson KL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Kleer CG; Oberman HA; Wilson TE; Pollak EW; Rochester AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 9930774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer.
    Gruber IV; Rueckert M; Kagan KO; Staebler A; Siegmann KC; Hartkopf A; Wallwiener D; Hahn M
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():328. PubMed ID: 23826951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a stellate lesion on mammography.
    Reiff DB; Cooke J; Griffin M; Given-Wilson R
    Clin Radiol; 1994 Jun; 49(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 8045063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Liberman L; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Samli B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 9016233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors.
    Kim JA; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Jeong J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1450-6. PubMed ID: 21606313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypes.
    Kim MY; Kim HS; Choi N; Yang JH; Yoo YB; Park KS
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 26259866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of clinicopathological features on the predictive accuracy of conventional breast imaging in determining the extent of screen-detected high-grade pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Hayward L; Oeppen RS; Grima AV; Royle GT; Rubin CM; Cutress RI
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Jul; 93(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 21943463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.
    Moon HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30322671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sonographic lesion size of ductal carcinoma in situ as a preoperative predictor for the presence of an invasive focus.
    Lee JW; Han W; Ko E; Cho J; Kim EK; Jung SY; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jul; 98(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 18459155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
    Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.