190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794100)
21. Correlation Between Screening Mammography Interpretive Performance on a Test Set and Performance in Clinical Practice.
Miglioretti DL; Ichikawa L; Smith RA; Buist DSM; Carney PA; Geller B; Monsees B; Onega T; Rosenberg R; Sickles EA; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K
Acad Radiol; 2017 Oct; 24(10):1256-1264. PubMed ID: 28551400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The outcome of a quality-controlled mammography screening program: experience from a population-based study in Taiwan.
Pan HB; Wong KF; Yang TL; Hsu GC; Chou CP; Huang JS; Lee SK; Chou YH; Chiang CL; Liang HL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Oct; 77(10):531-4. PubMed ID: 25103986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.
Lee EH; Kim KW; Kim YJ; Shin DR; Park YM; Lim HS; Park JS; Kim HW; Kim YM; Kim HJ; Jun JK
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 27390540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?
Henderson LM; Benefield T; Bowling JM; Durham DD; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Yankaskas BC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 25794085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.
Rosenberg RD; Yankaskas BC; Abraham LA; Sickles EA; Lehman CD; Geller BM; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE; Ballard-Barbash R
Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 16990671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
Bernardi D; Caumo F; Macaskill P; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Addressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: mammography as an example.
Burnside ES; Lin Y; Munoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ; Wu Y; Strigel RM; Elezaby MA; Kerr EA; Miglioretti DL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89418. PubMed ID: 24586763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.
Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Carney PA; Sickles EA; Elmore JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 26204300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.
Lee CS; Goldman L; Grimm LJ; Liu IX; Simanowith M; Rosenberg R; Zuley M; Moy L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Feb; 203(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 37897646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance assessment for radiologists interpreting screening mammography.
Woodard DB; Gelfand AE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1532-51. PubMed ID: 16847870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.
Taplin SH; Abraham L; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Buist DS; Smith-Bindman R; Lehman C; Weaver D; Carney PA; Barlow WE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jul; 102(14):1040-51. PubMed ID: 20601590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is maximum positive predictive value a good indicator of an optimal screening mammography practice?
Hardesty LA; Klym AH; Shindel BE; Chough DM; Sumkin JH; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1505-7. PubMed ID: 15855105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.
Kim YJ; Lee EH; Jun JK; Shin DR; Park YM; Kim HW; Kim Y; Kim KW; Lim HS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Jo HM;
Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 28670157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations?
Jackson SL; Cook AJ; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Brenner RJ; Elmore JG
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 22130089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience.
Shaw CM; Flanagan FL; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):354-62. PubMed ID: 19188311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.
Théberge I; Chang SL; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Guertin MH; Pelletier E; Brisson J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):djt461. PubMed ID: 24598715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography.
Yankaskas BC; Cleveland RJ; Schell MJ; Kozar R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 11517044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
