These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794101)

  • 1. Medicolegal--malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Must all monitors meet DICOM standards?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W492. PubMed ID: 25794101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
    Thompson DP; Koller CJ; Eatough JP
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):256-60. PubMed ID: 17038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting.
    Wade C; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):465-71. PubMed ID: 15151966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
    Wang J; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():216-8. PubMed ID: 12105732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.
    McIlgorm DJ; McNulty JP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140148. PubMed ID: 25421807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: ACR practice guidelines concerning addendum reports.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):W158. PubMed ID: 23789689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicolegal: malpractice and ethical issues in radiology.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):W533. PubMed ID: 23617522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: What is “reasonable assurance of receipt?”.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):W159. PubMed ID: 23789690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DICOM gray-scale standard display function: clinical diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography in medical-grade gray-scale and consumer-grade color displays.
    Salazar AJ; Aguirre DA; Ocampo J; Camacho JC; Díaz XA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jun; 202(6):1272-80. PubMed ID: 24848825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicolegal-Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):W265-W266. PubMed ID: 29787315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of medium-resolution monochrome cathode ray tube displays for the purpose of board examinations.
    Evanoff MG; Roehrig H; Giffords RS; Capp MP; Rovinelli RJ; Hartmann WH; Merritt C
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11442114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicolegal--Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology. What Is Reasonable Conduct?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):W565. PubMed ID: 26496579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MEDICOLEGAL * Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: ACR practice guidelines and standard of care.
    Berlin L;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):W324. PubMed ID: 23436878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Maslennikov A; Mitchell CA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16437286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality.
    Hangiandreou NJ; Fetterly KA; Bernatz SN; Cesar LJ; Groth DS; Felmlee JP
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):180-6. PubMed ID: 9735464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of grey-scale standard display function as a calibration tool for diagnostic liquid crystal display monitors using psychophysical analysis.
    Asai Y; Shintani Y; Yamaguchi M; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 May; 43(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 16035218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Displays at health centers insufficient for radiological diagnostics].
    Liukkonen E; Niinimäki J; Tervonen O; Nieminen M
    Duodecim; 2010; 126(6):650-8. PubMed ID: 20597316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality-control issues on high-resolution diagnostic monitors.
    Parr LF; Anderson AL; Glennon BK; Fetherston P
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11442103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.