These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794391)

  • 1. Fractal analysis for reduced reference image quality assessment.
    Xu Y; Liu D; Quan Y; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jul; 24(7):2098-109. PubMed ID: 25794391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Gabor Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Screen Content Images.
    Ni Z; Zeng H; Ma L; Hou J; Chen J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Sep; 27(9):4516-4528. PubMed ID: 29897876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Dual-Domain Feature Fusion.
    Cui Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Mar; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 33286117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on the Fusion of Statistical and Perceptual Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison-Based Image Quality Assessment for Selecting Image Restoration Parameters.
    Liang H; Weller DS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5118-5130. PubMed ID: 27552759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Completely blind image quality assessment via image gray-scale fluctuations and fractal dimension analysis.
    Yang X; Sun Q; Wang T
    Appl Opt; 2018 Apr; 57(12):3268-3280. PubMed ID: 29714314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Spatial and Geometry Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Light Field Images.
    Huang H; Zeng H; Hou J; Chen J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3765-3779. PubMed ID: 35604974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quaternion wavelet transform based full reference image quality assessment for multiply distorted images.
    Li C; Li Y; Yuan Y; Wu X; Sang Q
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199430. PubMed ID: 29949615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Zhang L; Mou X; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2378-86. PubMed ID: 21292594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality assessment based on multiscale geometric analysis.
    Gao X; Lu W; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1409-23. PubMed ID: 19447715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image Quality Assessment Based on Local Linear Information and Distortion-Specific Compensation.
    Hanli Wang ; Jie Fu ; Weisi Lin ; Sudeng Hu ; Jay Kuo CC; Lingxuan Zuo
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Feb; 26(2):915-926. PubMed ID: 28113319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oriented correlation models of distorted natural images with application to natural stereopair quality evaluation.
    Su CC; Cormack LK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 May; 24(5):1685-99. PubMed ID: 25751864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractal-feature distance as a substitute for observer performance index in contrast-detail examination.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 17689214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fourier transform based scalable image quality measure.
    Narwaria M; Lin W; McLoughlin I; Emmanuel S; Chia LT
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Aug; 21(8):3364-77. PubMed ID: 22562758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-reference quality assessment of natural stereopairs.
    Chen MJ; Cormack LK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Sep; 22(9):3379-91. PubMed ID: 23771336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Full-reference quality estimation for images with different spatial resolutions.
    Demirtas AM; Reibman AR; Jafarkhani H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 May; 23(5):2069-80. PubMed ID: 24686279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.