These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794478)

  • 1. Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.
    Morrill T; Baese-Berk M; Heffner C; Dilley L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1451-7. PubMed ID: 25794478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interaction of lexical tone, intonation and semantic context in on-line spoken word recognition: an ERP study on Cantonese Chinese.
    Kung C; Chwilla DJ; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():293-309. PubMed ID: 24315803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of speech rate and accent on access and use of semantic information.
    Sajin SM; Connine CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):619-636. PubMed ID: 26822465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables.
    Baese-Berk MM; Dilley LC; Henry MJ; Vinke L; Banzina E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):571-589. PubMed ID: 30488190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):147-65. PubMed ID: 21848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical Segmentation in Artificial Word Learning: The Effects of Converging Sublexical Cues.
    Bagou O; Frauenfelder UH
    Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 29280405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for labeling speech with acoustic cues to linguistic distinctive features.
    Huilgol S; Baik J; Shattuck-Hufnagel S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):EL184. PubMed ID: 31472587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic re-weighting of acoustic and contextual cues in spoken word recognition.
    Bushong W; Jaeger TF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):EL135. PubMed ID: 31472578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.
    Kaufeld G; Bosker HR; Ten Oever S; Alday PM; Meyer AS; Martin AE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 40(49):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 33097640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When speaker identity is unavoidable: Neural processing of speaker identity cues in natural speech.
    Tuninetti A; Chládková K; Peter V; Schiller NO; Escudero P
    Brain Lang; 2017 Nov; 174():42-49. PubMed ID: 28715718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of fluent speech.
    Cooper WE
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():48-63. PubMed ID: 6575669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Kong YY; Donaldson G; Somarowthu A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2846-57. PubMed ID: 25994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects.
    Sumner M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL26-32. PubMed ID: 23862902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of native-language tones on lexical access in the second language.
    Shook A; Marian V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3102. PubMed ID: 27369132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of syntax in perceptual compensation for phonological reduction.
    Tuinman A; Mitterer H; Cutler A
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):68-85. PubMed ID: 24754221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
    McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How visual cues to speech rate influence speech perception.
    Bosker HR; Peeters D; Holler J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1523-1536. PubMed ID: 32160814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.