These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience. Erten MZ; Fernandez LP; Ng HK; McKinnon WC; Heald B; Koliba CJ; Greenblatt MS Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 27384051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ladabaum U; Wang G; Terdiman J; Blanco A; Kuppermann M; Boland CR; Ford J; Elkin E; Phillips KA Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 21768580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance characteristics of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in unselected women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who have undergone universal germline mutation testing. Ferguson SE; Aronson M; Pollett A; Eiriksson LR; Oza AM; Gallinger S; Lerner-Ellis J; Alvandi Z; Bernardini MQ; MacKay HJ; Mojtahedi G; Tone AA; Massey C; Clarke BA Cancer; 2014 Dec; 120(24):3932-9. PubMed ID: 25081409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan. Chen YE; Kao SS; Chung RH PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160599. PubMed ID: 27482709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for Lynch syndrome and referral to clinical genetics by selective mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry testing: an audit and cost analysis. Colling R; Church DN; Carmichael J; Murphy L; East J; Risby P; Kerr R; Chetty R; Wang LM J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1036-9. PubMed ID: 26201544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Family matters in lynch syndrome. Kastrinos F; Steyerberg EW J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Apr; 107(4):. PubMed ID: 25794515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome. Kang YJ; Killen J; Caruana M; Simms K; Taylor N; Frayling IM; Snowsill T; Huxley N; Coupe VM; Hughes S; Freeman V; Boussioutas A; Trainer AH; Ward RL; Mitchell G; Macrae FA; Canfell K Med J Aust; 2020 Feb; 212(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 31595523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Snowsill T; Coelho H; Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Briscoe S; Frayling IM; Hyde C Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(51):1-238. PubMed ID: 28895526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initiation of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients as a model for the implementation of genetic information into clinical oncology practice. Cohen SA; Laurino M; Bowen DJ; Upton MP; Pritchard C; Hisama F; Jarvik G; Fichera A; Sjoding B; Bennett RL; Naylor L; Jacobson A; Burke W; Grady WM Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 26480326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients. Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():313. PubMed ID: 25910169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of reflex testing for Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer in the UK setting. Snowsill TM; Ryan NAJ; Crosbie EJ; Frayling IM; Evans DG; Hyde CJ PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221419. PubMed ID: 31469860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age. Leenen CH; Goverde A; de Bekker-Grob EW; Wagner A; van Lier MG; Spaander MC; Bruno MJ; Tops CM; van den Ouweland AM; Dubbink HJ; Kuipers EJ; Dinjens WN; van Leerdam ME; Steyerberg EW Genet Med; 2016 Oct; 18(10):966-73. PubMed ID: 26938782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Universal Screening for Mismatch-Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancers to Identify Patients With Lynch Syndrome and Lynch-like Syndrome. Watkins JC; Yang EJ; Muto MG; Feltmate CM; Berkowitz RS; Horowitz NS; Syngal S; Yurgelun MB; Chittenden A; Hornick JL; Crum CP; Sholl LM; Howitt BE Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):115-127. PubMed ID: 27556954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population. Cenin DR; Naber SK; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Jenkins MA; Buchanan DD; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary P J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1737-1744. PubMed ID: 29645364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome. Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(58):1-406. PubMed ID: 25244061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy. Pastorino R; Basile M; Tognetto A; Di Marco M; Grossi A; Lucci-Cordisco E; Scaldaferri F; De Censi A; Federici A; Villari P; Genuardi M; Ricciardi W; Boccia S PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235038. PubMed ID: 32609729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for Lynch syndrome. Wang G; Kuppermann M; Kim B; Phillips KA; Ladabaum U Am J Manag Care; 2012 May; 18(5):e179-85. PubMed ID: 22694112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of universal immunohistochemistry on Lynch syndrome diagnosis in an Australian colorectal cancer cohort. Loh Z; Williams DS; Salmon L; Dow E; John T Intern Med J; 2019 Oct; 49(10):1278-1284. PubMed ID: 30667141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]