154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794900)
1. Chinese Academic Assessment and Incentive System.
Suo Q
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):297-9. PubMed ID: 25794900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Standards for papers on cloning.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
Nicholson JK
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trust-but verify-scientific findings.
Rutkowski JL
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):1. PubMed ID: 25699641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Author, author burning bright; author, author are you right?
Pederson T
FASEB J; 2006 Apr; 20(6):600. PubMed ID: 16581966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific fraud: action needed in China.
Lancet; 2010 Jan; 375(9709):94. PubMed ID: 20109871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publication of chemical research: do we need ethical standards?
Karlberg B
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2007 Jan; 387(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 17111106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
Svetlov V
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room?
Luther F
J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.
Fenning TM
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Corporate culture has no place in academia.
Hallonsten O
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7623):7. PubMed ID: 27708316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. World Map of Scientific Misconduct.
Ataie-Ashtiani B
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1653-1656. PubMed ID: 28653166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
