BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794900)

  • 21. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
    Skórka P
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact factors: Cash puts publishing ethics at risk in China.
    Huggett S
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7420):342. PubMed ID: 23075972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cash for papers: putting a premium on publication.
    Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):792. PubMed ID: 16778850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
    Brookfield J
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Next steps in the Schön affair.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
    Kritchevsky D
    Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.
    Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combating scientific misconduct.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Jan; 13(1):1. PubMed ID: 21173798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exaggerating one's success is rife in Chinese academia.
    Huang Z
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7090):150. PubMed ID: 16688148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scientific misconduct.
    Balaji SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):1. PubMed ID: 25961605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
    Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.
    Glover D
    J Wound Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 16521599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all].
    Staff A; Rørtveit G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
    Gordon SE
    J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.