These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794900)
41. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen. Michell B Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned. Adam D; Knight J Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. What has Science's open-access sting taught us about the quality of peer review? Tatalović M Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 24427852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The joy of discovery. de Duve C Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Ethics in publishing; are we practising to the highest possible standards? Hunter JM Br J Anaesth; 2000 Sep; 85(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 11103170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Statement of purpose revisited. Organ CH Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):989. PubMed ID: 11529818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Peer review: phony data, shoddy work or revolutionary results? "Truth will out". Friedman JH Med Health R I; 2000 Jul; 83(7):198. PubMed ID: 10934817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]