These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794900)

  • 41. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Not-so-deep impact.
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1003-4. PubMed ID: 15973362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A reprogramming rush.
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7186):388. PubMed ID: 18368078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
    Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fraud: just say no!
    Blaustein JD
    Endocrinology; 2010 Jan; 151(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20028876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
    Biagioli M
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts.
    Slade E; Tamber PS
    Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What has Science's open-access sting taught us about the quality of peer review?
    Tatalović M
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 24427852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The joy of discovery.
    de Duve C
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ethics in publishing; are we practising to the highest possible standards?
    Hunter JM
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Sep; 85(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 11103170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Statement of purpose revisited.
    Organ CH
    Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):989. PubMed ID: 11529818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Peer review: phony data, shoddy work or revolutionary results? "Truth will out".
    Friedman JH
    Med Health R I; 2000 Jul; 83(7):198. PubMed ID: 10934817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.