These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25794913)

  • 21. Analysis of the misfit of dental implant-supported prostheses made with three manufacturing processes.
    Fernández M; Delgado L; Molmeneu M; García D; Rodríguez D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 24176182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Settling of abutments into implants and changes in removal torque in five different implant-abutment connections. Part 1: Cyclic loading.
    Kim KS; Han JS; Lim YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1079-84. PubMed ID: 25216133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Influence of a Positioning Hex on Abutment Rotation in Tapered Internal Implants: A 3D Finite Element Model Study.
    Hyun DG; Kwon HB; Lim YJ; Koak JY; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 32142564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
    de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Vitro Comparison of Microbial Leakage of the Implant-Healing Abutment Interface in Four Connection Systems.
    Ardakani MRT; Meimandi M; Amid R; Pourahmadie AD; Shidfar S
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):350-355. PubMed ID: 31389766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Micromovement Evaluation of Original and Compatible Abutments at the Implant-abutment Interface.
    Berberi A; Maroun D; Kanj W; Amine EZ; Philippe A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):907-913. PubMed ID: 27965499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implant-Abutment Contact Surfaces and Microgap Measurements of Different Implant Connections Under 3-Dimensional X-Ray Microtomography.
    Scarano A; Valbonetti L; Degidi M; Pecci R; Piattelli A; de Oliveira PS; Perrotti V
    Implant Dent; 2016 Oct; 25(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 27551879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening/untightening sequences.
    Bernardes SR; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M; Hobkirk J; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 24451858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro integrity of implant external hexagon after application of surgical placement torque simulating implant locking.
    Davi LR; Golin AL; Bernardes SR; Araújo CA; Neves FD
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 18622481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of clockwise and counterclockwise twisting moments on abutment screw loosening.
    Yao KT; Kao HC; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Yip SW; Hsu ML
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1181-6. PubMed ID: 22092296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.
    Ribeiro CG; Maia ML; Scherrer SS; Cardoso AC; Wiskott HW
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 19(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 21710094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
    Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of abutment screw tightening on screw joint configuration.
    Lang LA; Wang RF; May KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 11807487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Microgap With Three-Dimensional X-Ray Microtomography: Internal Hexagon Versus Cone Morse.
    Scarano A; Mortellaro C; Mavriqi L; Pecci R; Valbonetti L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):682-5. PubMed ID: 27092918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.