743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25795349)
1. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels.
Kisenwether JS; Sataloff RT
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
Bottalico P; Codino J; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Marks K; Nudelman CJ; Skeffington J; Shrivastav R; Jackson-Menaldi MC; Hunter EJ; Rubin AD
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses.
Lopes LW; Batista Simões L; Delfino da Silva J; da Silva Evangelista D; da Nóbrega E Ugulino AC; Oliveira Costa Silva P; Jefferson Dias Vieira V
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e15-382.e26. PubMed ID: 27742492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hori R; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Objective multi-parameters analysis of the voice dysphonia].
Yu P; Wang G; Han B; Yang W; Han D
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 18(12):751-4. PubMed ID: 15831052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-evaluation in Patients With Voice Disorders.
Lopes LW; da Silva JD; Simões LB; Evangelista DDS; Silva POC; Almeida AA; de Lima-Silva MFB
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119.e1-119.e10. PubMed ID: 27049448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-Reported Voice Disorders Among Female Teachers.
Lin FC; Chen SH; Chen SC; Wang CT; Kuo YC
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 26096986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
Franca MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
