These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25795379)

  • 21. Profiling Surgical Staplers: How to Increase the Strength of Anastomoses between the Edematous and Normal Intestine.
    Kimura M; Terashita Y
    Am Surg; 2016 Dec; 82(12):e333-335. PubMed ID: 28234160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of staple size, tissue thickness, and precompression time on staple shape in side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in specimens obtained from healthy horses at an abattoir.
    Giusto G; Gandini M; Amedeo S
    Am J Vet Res; 2014 Jul; 75(7):680-4. PubMed ID: 24959735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Staple penetration and staple histological response for attaching an epimysial electrode onto the abdominal surface of the diaphragm using a laparoscopic approach.
    Schmit BD; Stellato TA; Mortimer JT
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Jan; 11(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 8994988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A novel narrow profile articulating powered vascular stapler provides superior access and haemostasis equivalent to conventional devices†.
    Ng CS; Pickens A; Siegel JM; Clymer JW; Cummings JF
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i73-8. PubMed ID: 26464450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not?
    Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Addario Chieco P; Cocorullo G; Cavallini M; Gulotta G
    J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Phung D; Abidin MR; Thacker JG; Rodeheaver GT; Westwater JJ; Doctor A; Edlich RF
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1988; 9(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 3192614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
    Salyer C; Spuzzillo A; Wakefield D; Gomaa D; Thompson J; Goodman M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):4016-4021. PubMed ID: 32749610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure.
    Mery CM; Shafi BM; Binyamin G; Morton JM; Gertner M
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 18226977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of titanium vascular closure staples with suture repair of the thoracic aorta in swine.
    Deb S; Martin B; Sun L; Burris D; Wherry D; Pikoulis E; Rhee P
    Chest; 2000 Dec; 118(6):1762-8. PubMed ID: 11115470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Staple line failure using the Proximate 100 mm linear cutter.
    Wind J; Safiruddin F; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Slors JF; Bemelman WA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1275-8. PubMed ID: 18523825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
    Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Superior staple formation with powered stapling devices.
    Kimura M; Terashita Y
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2016; 12(3):668-672. PubMed ID: 26944550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intestinal mucosa staple line integrity and anastomotic leak pressure after healing in a porcine model.
    Naoi D; Horie H; Koinuma K; Kumagai Y; Ota G; Tojo M; Kaneda Y; Hishikawa S; Sadatomo A; Inoue Y; Fukushima N; Lefor AK; Sata N
    Surg Today; 2021 Oct; 51(10):1713-1719. PubMed ID: 33743053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New advances in automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Jones KC; Himel HN; Towler MA; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    Burns; 1993 Apr; 19(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8471153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finite element modelling of stapled colorectal end-to-end anastomosis: advantages of variable height stapler design.
    Nováček V; Tran TN; Klinge U; Tolba RH; Staat M; Bronson DG; Miesse AM; Whiffen J; Turquier F
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2693-7. PubMed ID: 22871347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo evaluation of a modified linear stapling device designed to facilitate accurate pathologic examination of the surgical margin.
    Tsujimoto H; Tsuda H; Hiraki S; Nomura S; Ito N; Kanematsu K; Horiguchi H; Aosasa S; Yamamoto J; Hase K
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Apr; 19(2):666-669. PubMed ID: 26199024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular staplers.
    Jones WB; Myers KM; Traxler LB; Bour ES
    Am Surg; 2008 Jun; 74(6):462-7; discussion 467-8. PubMed ID: 18556986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intersecting staple lines in intestinal anastomoses.
    Ravitch MM
    Surgery; 1985 Jan; 97(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 3880937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Does the third staple line of a new endostapler offer an advantage?].
    Czymek R; Keller R; Hildebrand P; Bouchard R; Bader FG; Jungbluth T; Mirow L; Roblick UJ; Bruch HP
    Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Jun; 134(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19536721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in restorative proctectomy and anterior resection: a randomized study.
    Senagore A; Lane FR; Lee E; Wexner S; Dujovny N; Sklow B; Rider P; Bonello J;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Mar; 57(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 24509454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.