369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25795630)
21. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.
Bornefalk H; Hermansson AB
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 15789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment.
Zheng B; Lu A; Hardesty LA; Sumkin JH; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Gur D
Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 16485416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.
Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 17278499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography.
Lladó X; Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Martí J
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Sep; 33(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 19406614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. SVM and neural networks comparison in mammographic CAD.
García-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macias M; González-Velasco H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3204-7. PubMed ID: 18002677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-aided diagnosis of malignant mammograms using Zernike moments and SVM.
Sharma S; Khanna P
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Feb; 28(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 25005867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
Masotti M
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
