These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25795922)

  • 1. Impact characteristics of a vehicle population in low speed front to rear collisions.
    Nishimura N; Simms CK; Wood DP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jun; 79():1-12. PubMed ID: 25795922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rear-end impacts: vehicle and occupant response.
    Davis CG
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(9):629-39. PubMed ID: 9868635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The rate of change of acceleration: implications to head kinematics during rear-end impacts.
    Hynes LM; Dickey JP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fundamental reconsideration of the CRASH3 damage analysis algorithm: the case against uniform ubiquitous linearity between BEV, peak collision force magnitude, and residual damage depth.
    Singh J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(7):718-24. PubMed ID: 23944384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing trunk muscle activations during simulated low-speed rear impact collisions.
    Fewster KM; Viggiani D; Gooyers CE; Parkinson RJ; Callaghan JP
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 31013170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulating the relative influence of tire, vehicle and driver factors on forward collision accident rates.
    Christ D
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():253-262. PubMed ID: 32563401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injury severity of pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists resulting from crashes with reversing cars.
    Decker S; Otte D; Cruz DL; Müller CW; Omar M; Krettek C; Brand S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Sep; 94():46-51. PubMed ID: 27240128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability in vehicle and dummy responses in rear-end collisions.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; Lawrence J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Sep; 6(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 16087468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic performances of different seat designs for low to medium velocity rear impact.
    Linder A; Olsson T; Truedsson N; Morris A; Fildes B; Sparke L
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2001; 45():187-201. PubMed ID: 12214349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study and comparison of the effects of low speed change vehicle collisions on the human body.
    Hoyes P; Henderson B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():318-24. PubMed ID: 23286836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating low-speed rear-end impact severity and resultant occupant stress parameters.
    Rosenbluth W; Hicks L
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Nov; 39(6):1393-424. PubMed ID: 7815021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Casualty risk of e-bike rider struck by passenger vehicle using China in-depth accident data.
    Hu L; Hu X; Wang J; Kuang A; Hao W; Lin M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(4):283-287. PubMed ID: 32297809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the impacts of speed variation on freeway traffic collisions in various traffic states.
    Li Z; Wang W; Chen R; Liu P; Xu C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(8):861-6. PubMed ID: 24073775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Injuries in Full-Scale Vehicle Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier and Pole Tests Using Postmortem Human Subjects.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar F; Humm J; Rudd R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S224-30. PubMed ID: 26436236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions.
    Ono K; Kanno M
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Jul; 28(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 8870776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.