292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25796099)
1. Are the QRS duration and ST depression cut-points from the Seattle criteria too conservative?
Dunn T; Abdelfattah R; Aggarwal S; Pickham D; Hadley D; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 25796099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of J-wave in elite athletes.
Pelliccia A; Quattrini FM
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 25796101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining QRS amplitude criteria for electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in recommendations for screening criteria in athletes.
Singla V; Jindal A; Pargaonkar V; Soofi M; Wheeler M; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 25661864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three ECG criteria for athlete pre-participation screening.
Pickham D; Zarafshar S; Sani D; Kumar N; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 25155389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrocardiographic right and left bundle branch block patterns in athletes: prevalence, pathology, and clinical significance.
Kim JH; Baggish AL
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 25836379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of "malignant" vs. "benign" electrocardiographic patterns of early repolarization.
Tikkanen JT; Huikuri HV
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 25634766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized Q wave dimensions in athletes and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.
Bent RE; Wheeler MT; Hadley D; Froelicher V; Ashley E; Perez MV
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 25732098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolving interpretation of the athlete's electrocardiogram: from European Society of Cardiology and Stanford criteria, to Seattle criteria and beyond.
Zorzi A; ElMaghawry M; Corrado D
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 25724348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in Swiss elite athletes detected with modern screening criteria.
Perrin T; Trachsel LD; Schneiter S; Menafoglio A; Albrecht S; Pirrello T; Eser P; Roten L; Gojanovic B; Wilhelm M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14376. PubMed ID: 28102875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Seattle Criteria increase the specificity of preparticipation ECG screening among elite athletes.
Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kalman J; Lo W; Fallon K; MacIsaac A; Prior D
Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1144-50. PubMed ID: 23813487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete: why the routine use of ECG is not necessary.
Roberts WO; Asplund CA; O'Connor FG; Stovitz SD
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 25669141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Best practices for ECG screening in children.
Vetter VL
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 25788105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical meaning of isolated increase of QRS voltages in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy versus athlete's heart.
Calore C; Zorzi A; Corrado D
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 25595718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and significance of isolated T wave inversion in 1755 consecutive American collegiate athletes.
Jacob D; Main ML; Gupta S; Gosch K; McCoy M; Magalski A
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 25795567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectrum of ST amplitude: athletes and an ambulatory clinical population.
Muramoto D; Singh N; Aggarwal S; Wong M; Adhikarla C; Hadley D; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 23866295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal computerized Q wave measurements in healthy young athletes.
Saini D; Grober AF; Hadley D; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 28159337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the 2010 European Society of Cardiology criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes.
Weiner RB; Hutter AM; Wang F; Kim JH; Wood MJ; Wang TJ; Picard MH; Baggish AL
Heart; 2011 Oct; 97(19):1573-7. PubMed ID: 21602522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern standards of ECG interpretation in young athletes: yield and effectiveness.
Asif IM; Prutkin JM
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 25595717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of screening history, physical exam, and ECG to detect potentially lethal cardiac disorders in athletes: a systematic review/meta-analysis.
Harmon KG; Zigman M; Drezner JA
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25701104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost Implications of Using Different ECG Criteria for Screening Young Athletes in the United Kingdom.
Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Gabus V; Merghani A; Finocchiaro G; Millar L; Narain R; Papadakis M; Naci H; Tome M; Sharma S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(7):702-11. PubMed ID: 27515329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
