496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25796409)
1. Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Hosang S; Heath M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():91-100. PubMed ID: 25796409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
Hosang S; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tactile-Based Pantomime Grasping: Knowledge of Results is Not Enough to Support an Absolute Calibration.
Heath M; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S
J Mot Behav; 2019; 51(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 29236589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distinct visual cues mediate aperture shaping for grasping and pantomime-grasping tasks.
Holmes SA; Lohmus J; McKinnon S; Mulla A; Heath M
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23971991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation.
Ayala N; Binsted G; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 29923096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The spatial relations between stimulus and response determine an absolute visuo-haptic calibration in pantomime-grasping.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2017 Jun; 114():29-39. PubMed ID: 28346879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.
Ozana A; Ganel T
Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):977-988. PubMed ID: 28871420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.
Chan J; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28070622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():197. PubMed ID: 27199718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.
Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1775-1787. PubMed ID: 29663023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.
Heath M; Manzone J
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 28280878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber's law.
Utz KS; Hesse C; Aschenneller N; Schenk T
Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):22-30. PubMed ID: 25872174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The visual coding of grip aperture shows an early but not late adherence to Weber's law.
Heath M; Mulla A; Holmes SA; Smuskowitz LR
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 490(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 21194553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues.
Whitwell RL; Milner AD; Cavina-Pratesi C; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():41-50. PubMed ID: 24300664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.
Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():573352. PubMed ID: 33329216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
