177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25798165)
1. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network laboratory guidelines for the use of serological tests (excluding point-of-care tests) for the diagnosis of syphilis in Canada.
Levett PN; Fonseca K; Tsang RS; Kadkhoda K; Serhir B; Radons SM; Morshed M
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol; 2015; 26 Suppl A(Suppl A):6A-12A. PubMed ID: 25798165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis].
Zarakolu P
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing for syphilis--rational use and interpretation.
Nadarajah M
Singapore Med J; 1990 Aug; 31(4):381-3. PubMed ID: 2255939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of nine different syphilis serological tests in comparison with the FTA-abs test.
Sonmez C; Sezen F; Kilic S
J Immunol Methods; 2019 Jan; 464():9-14. PubMed ID: 30138611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serological diagnosis of syphilis. PHLS Syphilis Serology Working Group.
Egglestone SI; Turner AJ
Commun Dis Public Health; 2000 Sep; 3(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 11014025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis.
Malm K; Andersson S; Fredlund H; Norrgren H; Biague A; Månsson F; Ballard R; Unemo M
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 26370737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding Utilization and Seroprevalence of Syphilis Tests in Local Clinics and Hospitals in Korea.
Choi R; Lee SG; Lee EH
Clin Lab; 2023 Jan; 69(1):. PubMed ID: 36649527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G
Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory Testing.
Demir Çuha M; Özdemir A; Evren K; Can B; Doyuk Z; Yiş R; Başbulut E; Us E; Kalem F; Appak Ö; Berkem R; Sönmez C; Zarakolu P; Saribaş Z; Şener B
Sex Transm Dis; 2022 Jun; 49(6):453-457. PubMed ID: 35312664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis: A survey to examine the range of tests used in Canada.
Tsang RS; Radons SM; Morshed M
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol; 2011; 22(3):83-7. PubMed ID: 22942884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: comparison of the Trep-Chek IgG enzyme immunoassay with other screening and confirmatory tests.
Tsang RS; Martin IE; Lau A; Sawatzky P
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 51(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 17854473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid diagnostic testing for syphilis in Arctic communities (the STAR study): a multisite prospective field diagnostic accuracy study in an intended-use setting.
Caya C; Singh AE; Serhir B; Morin V; Libman MD; Corsini R; Goldfarb DM; Wong T; Xia Y; Maheu-Giroux M; Yansouni CP
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2023 Oct; 29(10):1335.e1-1335.e7. PubMed ID: 37330139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.
Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value and performance evaluation of five serological tests for the detection of Treponema pallidum.
Liu C; Ou Q; Chen H; Chen J; Lin S; Jiang L; Yang B
J Clin Lab Anal; 2014 May; 28(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 24478062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a rapid one-step immunochromatographic test and two immunoenzymatic assays for the detection of anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies.
van Dommelen L; Smismans A; Goossens VJ; Damoiseaux J; Bruggeman CA; van Tiel FH; Hoebe CJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Aug; 84(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 18216156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay-negative sera following screening by treponemal total antibody enzyme immunoassays.
Maple PA; Ratcliffe D; Smit E
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1718-22. PubMed ID: 20844087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.
Binnicker MJ; Jespersen DJ; Rollins LO
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 49(4):1313-7. PubMed ID: 21346050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
