231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25798412)
1. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern.
Park IY; Kim JH; Park YH
Korean J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 45(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 25798412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
Zhou J; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of temporomandibular joints in relation to ages and vertical facial types in skeletal class II female patients: a multiple-cross-sectional study.
Zhou J; Yang H; Li Q; Li W; Liu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):467. PubMed ID: 38632555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive three-dimensional positional and morphological assessment of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II patients with mandibular retrognathism in different vertical skeletal patterns.
Al-Hadad SA; ALyafrusee ES; Abdulqader AA; Al-Gumaei WS; Al-Mohana RAAM; Ren L
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):149. PubMed ID: 35484618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology and Facial Asymmetry in Individuals with Different Vertical Skeletal Growth Patterns.
Diwakar R; Bucci R; Kaushik A; Bansal A; Bucci P; Kochhar AS; Spagnuolo G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Noh KJ; Baik HS; Han SS; Jang W; Choi YJ
Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 33678628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cone-beam CT analysis of vertical control of mandible and changes of temporomandibular joint in adult patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion with high angle].
Wei Y; Zhang GR; Liu YN; Chen WYF; Zhang XZ; Cao BC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Nov; 57(11):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 36379894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns - a cross-sectional study.
Santander P; Quast A; Olbrisch C; Rose M; Moser N; Schliephake H; Meyer-Marcotty P
Head Face Med; 2020 Nov; 16(1):33. PubMed ID: 33256789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study.
Ma Q; Bimal P; Mei L; Olliver S; Farella M; Li H
J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Jul; 149(7):589-598. PubMed ID: 29655707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between condylar position and vertical skeletal craniofacial morphology: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Paknahad M; Shahidi S
Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):740-751. PubMed ID: 29111131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class II malocclusion.
Lin M; Xu Y; Wu H; Zhang H; Wang S; Qi K
J Int Med Res; 2020 Feb; 48(2):300060519892388. PubMed ID: 31878826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional and positional temporomandibular joint osseous characteristics in normodivergent facial patterns with and without temporomandibular disorders.
Alhammadi MS; Almashraqi AA; Thawaba AA; Fayed MMS; Aboalnaga AA
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5011-5020. PubMed ID: 37358688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.
Pancherz H; Michailidou C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of condylar cortical bone thickness in patient groups with different vertical facial dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lo Giudice A; Rustico L; Caprioglio A; Migliorati M; Nucera R
Odontology; 2020 Oct; 108(4):669-675. PubMed ID: 32236830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive positional and morphological assessments of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a retrospective CBCT study.
Chen Y; Li L; Li Y; Luo N; Dai H; Zhou J
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 36750919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional and Positional Associations between the Mandibular Condyle and Glenoid Fossa: A Three-dimensional Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based Study.
Almashraqi AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 33686026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of morphological and morphometric characteristics of the temporomandibular joint in children with different skeletal models in the sagittal and vertical direction.
Sırlı Yılmazturk S; Bozdemir E; Orhan K; Orhan H
Oral Radiol; 2024 Apr; 40(2):178-187. PubMed ID: 38010496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporomandibular joint morphology in Korean using cone-beam computed tomography: influence of age and gender.
Yun JM; Choi YJ; Woo SH; Lee UL
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 43(1):21. PubMed ID: 34224004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study.
Reis AS; Copello FM; de Castro ACR; Cevidanes LHS; do Rego MV; Visconti MA; Ruellas ACO
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):687-694. PubMed ID: 37246594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
