These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25799113)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
    Morris S; Gurusamy KS; Sheringham J; Davidson BR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121699. PubMed ID: 25799113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary abnormalities in postcholecystectomy patients: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies.
    Howard K; Lord SJ; Speer A; Gibson RN; Padbury R; Kearney B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 16673687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis.
    Romagnuolo J; Currie G;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15672062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
    Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
    Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.
    Giljaca V; Gurusamy KS; Takwoingi Y; Higgie D; Poropat G; Štimac D; Davidson BR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD011549. PubMed ID: 25719224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
    Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
    Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.
    Epelboym I; Winner M; Allendorf JD
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 May; 17(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 23515912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural imaging and timing of ERCP.
    Sperna Weiland CJ; Verschoor EC; Poen AC; Smeets XJMN; Venneman NG; Bhalla A; Witteman BJM; Timmerhuis HC; Umans DS; van Hooft JE; Bruno MJ; Fockens P; Verdonk RC; Drenth JPH; van Geenen EJM;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 36163565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
    Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Meagher S; Yusoff I; Kennedy W; Martel M; Adam V; Barkun A
    Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
    Kohut M; Nowakowska-Duława E; Marek T; Kaczor R; Nowak A
    Endoscopy; 2002 Apr; 34(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 11932785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
    Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic liver test patterns do not predict bile duct stones.
    Yu CY; Roth N; Jani N; Cho J; Van Dam J; Selby R; Buxbaum J
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Oct; 33(10):3300-3313. PubMed ID: 30911921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study.
    Scaffidi MG; Luigiano C; Consolo P; Pellicano R; Giacobbe G; Gaeta M; Blandino A; Familiari L
    Minerva Med; 2009 Oct; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
    Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging.
    Ang TL; Teo EK; Fock KM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Oct; 26(8):1163-70. PubMed ID: 17894658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors for choledocholitiasis in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound.
    Vaynshtein J; Sabbag G; Pinsk I; Rahmani I; Reshef A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):335-339. PubMed ID: 29421933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.